Talk:Copycats

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

Restructuring

I've begun to restructure the article. The way it was, there was a lot of repetition in the description of the Chinese whispers rounds. There was also inaccuracy - the answer to be determined is what was supplied to the first team member, not what the previous player actually performed (despite what the hosts tend to say).

But before I work on the physical challenges section:

Is the misspelling of "doughnut" part of the official name of this challenge?
How does Big Foot Bangers fit into the programme structure? Is it just a round that's sometimes played instead of a round that one team plays on a play-or-pass basis, or what? (Maybe I just need to watch the programme more....)

-- Smjg (talk) 17:24, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The format of the game has changed recently, I think most of these games are now obselete. RichardOwen97 talk 20:20, 27 January, 2011 (UTC)

In that case, we need to improve the article to address these changes. Is anyone here familiar with the show enough to do this? -- Smjg (talk) 19:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]