Talk:Conversational user interface
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]AFC comment I agree with the previous review; this needs better sourcing, both in terms of in-line references, and also using higher-quality sources. A few minutes of searching turned up these:
- https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=348971
- https://www.ibm.com/blogs/insights-on-business/ibmix/alexa-whats-future-conversational-interface/
- https://www.computerworld.com/article/3225509/emerging-technology/the-coming-evolution-of-the-conversational-interface.html
- https://developers.google.com/actions/design/
- https://books.google.com/books/about/Developing_Conversational_Interfaces_for.html?id=nQdGDwAAQBAJ
These all seem like higher-quality sources than what you're using. I'm convinced this is a good topic for an encyclopedia article, but the current version needs more work. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:34, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Title should be singular "interface", not "interfaces"
[edit]The title should be "Conversational user interface" (singular), not "Conversational user interfaces" (plural).
Karl gregory jones (talk) 11:13, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- I thought so, too. (Independently.) I've requested the move at WP:RM#Uncontroversial technical requests (because it wouldn't let me "move over redirect"). - 23:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)