Talk:Conversation Piece at the Royal Lodge, Windsor

Conversation Piece at the Royal Lodge, Windsor has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 4, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

British Royalty Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Conversation Piece at the Royal Lodge, Windsor appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 October 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Herbert James Gunn used a paper cut-out of Princess Elizabeth's corgi dog to help him paint his Conversation Piece at the Royal Lodge, Windsor?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Conversation Piece at the Royal Lodge, Windsor.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 20:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Herbert James Gunn used a paper cut-out of Princess Elizabeth's corgi dog to help him paint his Conversation Piece at the Royal Lodge, Windsor? Source: "Conversation piece at the Royal Lodge, Windsor" National Portrait Gallery, London
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/R. H. Rodgers

Created by No Swan So Fine (talk). Self-nominated at 16:12, 1 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Reviewing... new enough, long enough, hook in article, will complete review soon. Whispyhistory (talk) 18:21, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
... Hook interesting, in article and followed by inline citation to a reputable reference containing hook fact. QPQ provided, article reads well and referenced. Whispyhistory (talk) 05:56, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Conversation Piece at the Royal Lodge, Windsor/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: APK (talk · contribs) 09:43, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox should have more details, including when it was completed, the artist, dimensions, etc.
Commas before and after "Princesses Elizabeth and Margaret" in the lead.
Add the abbreviation for the National Portrait Gallery in the background section, so it can be used in the following sections. Currently, sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't.
Royal Lodge should be linked the first time it's mentioned in the background section and unlinked in the description section.
Comma after "Margaret" in description section.
"It was designed by Jeffry Wyatville." The drawing room or the Royal Lodge?
"Second World War" should be linked.
Afternoon tea is linked twice.
"The Times" should be linked.
Add a comma after "boring"
"North Shore" should be linked.
"had lunch with Elizabeth" She's referred to as queen in the previous sentence, then just by her first name. I'd pick one or the other.
References should be archived.
Earwig's check looks fine. It's just reporting quotes.

It was a pleasure reading another one of your articles. APK hi :-) (talk) 09:43, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good.

Done APK hi :-) (talk) 05:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@APK:, thank you so much! It looks in much better shape now. Right, I'm off to attend to the memorial chapel now. No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:33, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]