Talk:Continental fragment

This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Continental fragment is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geography Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 7 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): N8mitchell. Peer reviewers: Jeartis17.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese archipelago

Is Japanese archipelago a microcontinent? It is not listed. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:33, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[1]. Search for Kurosegawa in other sources. — kwami (talk) 10:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Continental fragment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131111152542/http://www.aemnp.eu/PDF/52_s2/52_s2_1.pdf to http://www.aemnp.eu/PDF/52_s2/52_S2_1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zealandia as a Microcontinent

Where is the source for this claim. As far as I am aware the classification of Zealandia as a Continent or Micro-continent is still a hotly debated issue with no firm decision reached in either case. Also, the link to utexas.edu is dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.9.239 (talk • contribs) 16:47, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Evaluation of Sources

All three articles have useful information, graphics, and data relevant to my topic. In all the articles, the citations got distracting. It would be mid-sentence, and there would be a giant gap filled with a citation until the sentence picked up again. Specifically, in the Nemcok article, the jargon and vocabulary was difficult for someone who does not have a background in the topic to follow. All the information is up to date since all the articles are less than 20 years old, and the process of continents fragmenting takes quite a bit of time (more than 20 years). Between the articles (for a total of 80 pages), I think there is more than enough information. In the Tetreault article, the information is presented the best as it is accurate and clear. The other two articles could use a little less jargon, but other than that, the information is accurate and useful. The article's do not have links to other Wikipedia pages, but they reference numerous other sources. N8mitchell (talk) 17:39, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]