Talk:Contagious shooting
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
Ghits for "contagious shooting" in quotation marks
[edit]- December 22, 2006 26,900
- November 27, 2006 27
- What'a a "Ghit"? --Daysleeper47 23:37, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
A Google hit! The day I created the article there were just 27 references to this phrase. Now there are 150,000.
NPOV?
[edit]I just added a POV warning because the "Incidents" section seems to me to make cops in general seem dangerous and it's pretty much the bulk of the article, but I'm not informed enough to add anything to balance that impression (e.g., a justification of what seems to be massive overreaction, or at least an explanation).–♥ «Charles A. L.» 19:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
I removed the tag, no judgments have been made, the term comes from the New York Times and all the incidents are reported in the media using the term "contagious shooting". If you think there is bias because there are only police shootings, see if you can find any military use for the term, or see what the equivalent is called in the military. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 19:47, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- I agree with removing the tag. As it stands right now, this article is barely above a dicdef, and it's not our job to redefine the term so it's less insulting to police officers. Natalie 20:39, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sure it is, that's what "neutrality" means. I don't actually dispute the idea that cops are out-of-control maniacs, but I'm not sure Wikipedia should be taking that line.–♥ «Charles A. L.» 03:19, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Again, no judgments are made. Its a "just the facts, ma'am" article. You can ask for a vote for deletion if you want. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 06:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
NPOV #2
[edit]I dispute the neutrality and/or the existence of this article, because this term is pretty plainly a bullshit neologism created by various police departments to excuse the callous murders committed by their own members. The article basically admits as much by listing a bunch of cold-blooded murders by American cops excused, using this term, by PDs and collaborationist media which, mind you, always attribute the term to the police. --Tothebarricades 07:53, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
while i agree with most of what you say, the article itself is not pov. maybe go for an afd as a neologism? -- frymaster 21:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Contagious shooting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110603111405/http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/05/30/2241990/police-gunmen-open-fire-on-south.html to http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/05/30/2241990/police-gunmen-open-fire-on-south.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Contagious shooting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100508152812/http://www.kent.edu/about/history/May4/memorials.cfm to http://www.kent.edu/about/history/May4/memorials.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Battle Of LA?
[edit]The Battle of LA in 1942 could be suggested as a case of contagious shooting, as it was believed a weather balloon was mistaken as a enemy aircraft, which triggered anti-aircraft batteries. 2001:569:6FF2:3DB3:B894:4D1A:3EC:28DF (talk) 19:39, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Start-Class Firearms articles
- Low-importance Firearms articles
- WikiProject Firearms articles
- Start-Class Law enforcement articles
- Unknown-importance Law enforcement articles
- WikiProject Law Enforcement articles
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles