Talk:Constitutional coup
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Constitutional coup article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 10 July 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Constitutional Coup to Constitutional coup. The result of the discussion was moved. |
capitalization
[edit]shouldn't this page be named "Constitutional coup"? coup's not a proper noun 2001:56A:F4BC:9500:90CD:DB9A:4565:E74F (talk) 16:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 10 July 2022
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Snow-moving this as an incorrectly filed uncontroversial technical move request. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:47, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Constitutional Coup → Constitutional coup – as correcttly noted by the IP above, it is not a proper noun and should not be capitalized. I tried to move it myself but I kept getting an error because Constitutional coup already exists as a redirect to this page. Davide King (talk) 17:59, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.