Talk:Constantine Paparrigopoulos

Greece Mid‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Untitled

It is uncontroversial that the name of this historian in English is almost always spelled "Constantine Paparrigopoulos". The form "Paparregopoulos" is found as a transliteration, but is rarely used in running English text, as checked in Google Scholar and Google Books. --Macrakis 18:19, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page moved. -GTBacchus^(talk) 02:33, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Priority

In Greece, Paparrigopoulos is often considered as the greatest historian of modern Greece, because he was the first who, in his History of the Greek Nation, regarded the history of Greece from the ancient years till nowadays as a unity, insisting on the continuity of the Greek nation.

Does this mean first to do so in Greek, or is the work of George Finlay really forgotten? That would be a shame. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:45, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With robust arguments the controversial theories of Jakob Philipp Fallmerayer regarding the racial origins of the Greeks

Such generalizations and general conclusions need to be made very factually. Otherwise, it goes into the realm of national mythology. Angel Angel 2 (talk) 00:07, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]