This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This new page is highly problematic. Firstly, it meanders aimlessly through reams of general political history with little focus on what must be its primary aim, i.e. to describe what is conservatism in the Hong Kong context. Very little is actually said about that but a great deal of buzzword after buzzword thrown together with no rhyme or reason. Secondly, the English is appalling, often inscrutable and mind-bendingly bad. That there is so much utter rubbish here it defies efforts of good-faith editing not least because its creator lmmnhn has a serious possession problem and reverts edits with gay abandon. I'm out of here, once again and leave WP Hong Kong Project to sink itself in this muck. sirlanz16:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
People in Hong Kong very rarely classify the pro-Beijing camp as "conservatives". The pro-Beijing camp does have certain characteristics in common:-
(1) Opposes increase in welfare expenditure;
(2) Supports Hong Kong's full integration with mainland China;
(3) Protects business interests;
(4) Values economic development above all;
(5) Favours social stability over equality, justice and anything else;
They may sound similar to the Republican Party, but then the Republicans value individual freedom which the pro-Beijing camp does not.
42.200.195.135 (talk) 07:50, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]