Talk:Connie Smith

Connie Smith has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 6, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 14, 2017, and August 14, 2021.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Indiana / Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

Country music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Connie Smith/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mr. R00t ^Talk 00:19, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: The prose is a tad bit long. Otherwise good.

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: - Sorry for the delay.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Very good.

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: In the musical career section there really need to be more images. Only three images in the article.
Overall:
Pass or Fail: Found another image on Flickr. Mr. R00t ^Talk 00:51, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: images, if three's all we have then that's all we can use, because they do have to be free ones. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:47, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do know that. I'm going to look around for free images of her. Mr. R00t ^Talk 17:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome

I've added this to the GA list. I've added the template. It is now a Good Article. Mr. R00t ^Talk 01:04, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do the math

Wiki says Marty Stuart was born 1958. This article says Marty saw Smith perform 38 years prior to their 1997 marriage. 1997 - 38 = 1959. Accordingly, Stuart saw Smith perform (and told his mother that one day he would marry Smith) when he was 1 year old (1959 - 1958 = 1). I don't think so. This article and the one on Stuart need to agree. 184.18.199.68 (talk) 03:59, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Connie Smith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090618182956/http://www.opry.com/MeetTheOpry/Members.aspx?id=104 to http://www.opry.com/MeetTheOpry/Members.aspx?id=104

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Connie Smith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Connie Smith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag

@Rms125a@hotmail.com: Are you able to summarise your concerns here. If you consider the issues pervasive, you may wish to initiate a Good article reassessment. TheDragonFire (talk) 12:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Extreme details and confessional-style tone appear to indicate, prima facie, that someone, either a fan or someone close to Smith, has edited the article. Nothing untoward so far, just tagged as notification, although I will have to review edit history and see what, if anything, was deleted or reworded. Yours, Quis separabit? 23:20, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This part is somewhat fancrufty and speculative: <blockquote>Despite her success, Smith is considered by some music critics to be one of the most underrated vocalists in country music history[2] due to the decision not to pursue super stardom with the non-country general media market like such contemporaries as Loretta Lynn, Dolly Parton, and Tammy Wynette.[3] Artists such as Parton,[4] George Jones,[5] and Chely Wright[6] have cited Smith as either one of the best vocalists in the music industry or their favorite female artist.</blockquote>
::: Quis separabit? 23:23, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone. I updated the overview to make it sound less fan-heavy. I also updated the infobox at the top of the page. Let me know what else I can do to improve the article. Thanks! ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 18:30, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy section has bad hyperlink

The URL for the citation regarding Rolling Stone's "100 Greatest Country Artists of All Time" goes to Lynn Anderson's ranking instead of Connie Smith's. Fixing the hyperlink is beyond my capability. Can someone please correct it? Perhaps it should link to the article in general, vs. to the specific section. Peterh6658 (talk) 14:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]