Talk:Connie Mack IV

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Connie Mack IV article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

U.S. Congress Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Florida

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

University of Florida (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Florida, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.University of FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject University of FloridaTemplate:WikiProject University of FloridaUniversity of Florida articles

Conservatism

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

House of Reps Website The House of Reps IP keeps making changes to this entry that are questionable - mainly deleting the fact that Mr. Mack is divorced and dating a high profile celebrity.

you mean the Scientologist Mary Bono?

Name

Didn't the original Cornelius McGillicuddy actually change his name to "Mack"? That would make Connie Mack his actual name and not just his nickname. The congressional directory lists him as "Connie Mack IV" and while it is common in the directory for a nickname to be used for the first name, I find it highly unlikely that they would list a nickname for a person's family name. Acsenray 15:25, 3 August 2006 (UTC) No, Connie Mack is still a nickname. His legal name is Cornelius McGillicuddy IV as property records and marriage records show.[reply]

How can we verify this? His official congressional biography doesn't mention it.[1] Will Beback talk 21:56, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Education

I went to Massanutten Military Academy in Virginia with Connie back in the Eighties. I'm surprised to see no mention of his attendance of MMA here. I was thinking of adding MMA to his education here, but aside from having him in my yearbook, etc. I'm not sure what other "proof" I need to show to pass wikistandards enough for its inclusion. Anyone have suggestions? I can provide a scan of my yearbook with his name/pict if needed. MMA website Cowicide (talk) 14:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That´s highschool, you will need the years of attendance or the year of graduation. If he did not graduate from that academy then that could create a wrongfull impresion but again, this is not a job application program. The usual manner is the following.

Education
Highschool Massanutten Military Acadamy, Virginia, USA, 198?-198?
Highschool Somewhere, 198? for the year of graduation.

(He might, after all, have transferred into the last year for a politically correct graduation).

Degree in whatever it should be, University of somewhere, Somestate, USA, 198?
Any other specialities after that because that seems to be of extreme importance. Can´t have a undergraduate congressman with pure talk and no bulls, or pure bulls and no do.

Some information concerning his standing to any and all residents in those nations he classifies as ´problematic´ and if that covers any and all NON-USA NATO nation residents residing in those nations. Secondly, his posture, as a high schooler, concerning reimbursement for billion of dollars to non-usa citizens in regard to damages caused by the USA in their war on terror. Especially towards the middle class everywhere. Afterall, Republicans of the United States allege to base their strength on that class. Very appreciative of that inclusion and/or the inclusion within wikimedias journalistic area.
PS: Virginia is another nation within that Union called the United States. Wouldn´t a highschool education in Virginia be somewhat problematic? He might have been brainwashed by the Virginian military to surrepticiously infiltrate for a future occupation of Florida. At least it is Eastern Southern Catholic States schooling and not New England protestantism.
Perhaps his standing on harashment of non-usa citizens inside the United States through 6th generation, advanced, surreptious ultra secret technology and monitoring equipment? They do do that overseas, especially against those with laizzes fair speach. (Fractalhints (talk) 19:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

fake name

obviously a fake name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.200.69.76 (talk) 16:24, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Altercations section

I haven't been following this story so I don't know whether it fits the notability criteria or not, but even if it does, the "History of Altercations" section as written is way, way, way overkill (pun sort of intended). Anyway, I commented it out while we sort this all out. Am happy to take a crack at it myself if nobody else steps up. Arbor8 (talk) 22:32, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think so? Then I suppose that not many news outlets would cover this, and if they did, they would be fringe, local outlets.

Oh, wait.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/12/connie-mack-florida-gop-senate-brawls-altercation-ron-gant_n_1339589.html

http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/elections/connie-macks-past-altercations-again-a-campaign-issue/1219639

http://www.ocala.com/article/20120312/WIRE/120319922

http://www.salon.com/2012/03/13/connie_mack_ivs_history_of_violence/

Furthermore, while this is information is obtained from recent media, this has been a campaign issue of his in the past. Many less notable public figures have similar sections that aren't contested, and in some cases expanded. I also doubt this would constitute tabloid journalism, considering the sources that can be readily found with a routine search.

What's the criteria for overkill? The relative size of this section to the rest of the article? Also, does the section violate NPOV guidelines? I really do welcome constructive criticism, but it would be lovely to see action taken on guideline principles, rather than opinion. --MadameArsenic (talk) 22:51, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Save the sarcasm, please. I'm not arguing that it's NPOV or non-notable, but rather that it fails WP:UNDUE. His history of physical altercations is legit, a blow-by-blow of every single one is too much. Arbor8 (talk) 21:39, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you asserting that this fails WP:UNDUE due to the content itself, or the design of the content? Consider the legal problems section of Darrell Issa's page. There are multiple instances of indiscretion and crime, yet this is not considered a failure of WP:UNDUE, so could it be the fact that each instance is marked up using quote boxes? In short, would you agree that a paraphrasing, or at least a condensing in design, of the content in question, would alleviate the concern of failing WP:UNDUE? --MadameArsenic (talk) 16:45, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think that would take care of it, yeah. Arbor8 (talk) 22:37, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have a big problem in that Mack doesn't seem to have initiated the physical contact in any of the examples. Are these watered down accounts? Was he even arrested in all of them? If not, it might be better to boil them even further down. "Mack was involved in several minor physical altercations between 1987 and 1992, a fact which became an issue during his campaigns for the House and Senate." Issa is a poor comparison as the charges were much more serious - firearms and weapons charges, multiple car thefts, and insurance fraud. A lot different than violating a club's no hat policy. Wknight94 ^talk 04:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This news article[2] has a good overview on some incidents. Not mentioning at all seems to violate NPOV because it looks like a whitewash of something that's been in the news repeatedly; it's been two months since the above comments have been posted and no one has yet posted anything. 96.245.116.174 (talk) 18:17, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yay

Now that is one of the most scrubbed articles I ever read. Connie Mack, as (not) explained by Connie Mack's campaign staff. 188.192.84.197 (talk) 12:36, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Connie Mack which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. --BDD (talk) 21:20, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Connie Mack IV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20040307193148/http://www.senate.gov:80/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Senate_Spouses.htm to http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Senate_Spouses.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:41, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Connie Mack IV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070725184700/http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/electionInfo/index.html to http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/electionInfo/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:29, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Connie Mack IV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:34, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]