Talk:Comparison of CalDAV and CardDAV implementations
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
owncloud serves up both carddav and caldav, no idea about rfc status
77.249.3.105 (talk) 02:48, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Owncloud, as well as Baïkal actually just ship SabreDAV, so those would be identical.
Kolab 3.1
[edit]Kolab 3.1 supports CalDAV and CardDAV since version 3.1 release in 2013-11. Could someone add it please? Neuhaus (talk) 17:58, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
New Colmn for RFC 6578
[edit]Would anyone mind if I added a new column for RFC 6578 support (Collection Synchronization for Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV)) ? Cgeier (talk) 21:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Comparison of CalDAV and CardDAV implementations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070830144410/http://chandlerproject.org:80/ to http://chandlerproject.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:10, 29 November 2016 (UTC)