A fact from Communist Party of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 July 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
So, this is an issue that pops up frequently in infoboxes, where completely out of context and ahistorical labels are added. The notion that CP RSFSR would be 'far left' is out of place, and left/right distinctions are best to be removed from the infobox. In what sense was CP RSFSR a 'far left' force in Soviet society? It was the sole legal party in RSFSR. Its leadership tended to be anti-Gorbachev hardliners, who contemporary Western commentators tended to describe as the 'conservatives' of the CPSU. --Soman (talk) 14:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And per the argument made in this edit summary by User:Pickelhaube103 - that argument still doesn't hold ground. It can be argued that NSDAP was a far-right force in German politics in the 1920s, although the label in itself isn't very helpful for understanding how that party evolved. But saying that NSDAP once it was entrenched as a state-bearing party was 'far right' doesn't work, since it definitely was the mainstream force of German politics at the time. )(Soviet/German analogies doesn't work 100% - throughout the period of NSDAP rule in Germany, the left parties continued to be active albeit clandestinely. In the Soviet Union, by the late 1980s, there was hardly anything left of the 1917 non-Bolshevik parties) --Soman (talk) 14:42, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In a multi-party system you can often identify different parties along a left-right axis, albeit this is not always entirely easy either. In a single-party system that distinction doesn't really work. Rather there were different trends within the CPSU, some that could sometimes be seem as more left or more right in one way or another. --Soman (talk) 16:44, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Two wrongs does make one right. There are thousands of article on Wikipedia on political parties, I edit some but not all. The NSDAP article has a large number of active editors, so any change there means dealing with a lengthy process. That though, doesn't mean we are bound to include the left/right label in infobox in this article. --Soman (talk) 10:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion