Talk:Communist Party of the Netherlands

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Who wrote the beginning of this article?

Something wrong with the beginning of the article:communism is never the same as sosial-demokratic — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.128.46.225 (talk) 09:24, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I shall take steps. 23:18, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Wow, you guys need some history lessons. --Soman (talk) 20:38, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, something is very wrong with the beginning of the article. Although the article discusses the very real changes which occurred to the SDP, the idea that the CPN was founded in 1909 is just a variety of Leninist phrase-mongering by which they set out to claim greater legitimacy for their own political movement. It might be relevant to assert that the CPN made this claim - I am sure there is evidence for this - without endorsing such a partisan viewpoint. Leutha (talk) 14:17, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know Lenin and Stalin were Social Democrats? Pre-1914/1917, the Marxist trends that eventually became the modern communist movement were part of the social democratic movement. Many of the main communist parties began with a social democratic identity (Chile, Sweden, etc.). The Dutch CPN is by no means unique in this regard. --Soman (talk) 20:51, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that comment, in fact I was aware of that. Not only those communists who accepted the Leninist party conception, but also those who rejected it such as Anton Pannekoek and Herman Gorter.Leutha (talk) 21:49, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]