Talk:Communicative competence

This page was proposed for deletion by Jeff G. (talk · contribs) on 22 November 2011 with the comment:
Reads like an essay
It was contested by Fifelfoo (talk · contribs) on 22-11-2011 with the comment:
This appears to be standard style for discussions of theoretical concepts in social science; there are two scholarlies with the term as the object of the study.

Linguistics: Theoretical Linguistics / Applied Linguistics High‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Theoretical Linguistics Task Force.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Areece14.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The external link doesn't work

for me anyway - something odd happens. Is this a safe link? http://www.edu.pref.kagoshima.jp/kari/iti-ken/English/Top/Communication/nouryoku.pdf

LookingGlass 18:13, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Communicative competence and the Communicative approach

In order to adjust the seat on my bicycle, I must use an allen wrench. This is a fact about my bicycle, not about allen wrenches.

In the same way, the Communicative approach to second-language pedagogy is based in part on understandings and assumptions related to Communicative competence. This is a fact about the communicative approach, not about communicative competence.

Canale and Swain are important early-adopters of the term, and should probably be mentioned on this page, but they should not be the central figures cited. Pedagogy should be a sub-section of the page, with a {{main|Communicative language teaching}} tag used to refer back to that page. Cnilep (talk) 17:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Needs reference specified.

Canale (1983) <- not in reference list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.10.74 (talk) 01:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clarify

Perhaps I'm thick, but I can't understand what this means.

scholars have found communicative competence as a superior model of language following Hymes' opposition to Chomsky's linguistic competence. This opposition has been adopted by those who seek new directions toward a communicative era...

Is that suggesting that there is no controversy, and everyone agrees communication must be studied alongside formal grammar? No one venerates Chomsky's approach anymore and everyone prefers Hymes'? I know for a fact that neither of those is true. If it's suggesting something else, what? Cnilep (talk) 09:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's worse than I thought. The sentences were closely paraphrased from paragraph 3 of Karimnia and Izadparast (2007). Cnilep (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Karimnia, A. and M. Izadparast. 2007. On communicative and linguistic competence. International Journal of Communication 17(1), 101–113. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Cnilep (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Organizing the article and separating into sections would help readers understand the article more --Baileymichaelis (talk) 23:05, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]