Talk:Common Turkic alphabet

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Central Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal Common Turkic alphabet is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Cyrillic alphabets#Turkic languages|Cyrillic script]] The anchor (Turkic languages) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

alternate names?

I assume "Uniform Turkic Alphabet" is the same thing as "New Turkic Alphabet"? Google currently has 42 hits on the latter phrase. I will make a redirect from "New Turkic Alphabet" to "Uniform Turkic Alphabet"; sorry if they are actually two separate things. --Mathew5000 10:29, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Title is totally wrong! "New Turkic Alphabet" that is translation from Russian is known also in Turkic languages as Jaŋalif (in modern notation Yanalif or Yangalif). Jaŋalif isn't Tatarish only6 it is common name in turkic languages with some phonetic variations e.g. Kazakh is Zhängälip. "Uniform Turkic Alphabet" is other kind of romanization for Turkic writing systems. It is based on modern Turkish alphabet (if for precision6 on CP1254 codepage set of characters). It was invented in middle of 1993 by symposium of turkologists and writers from turkic-language countries and territories (ch. 30). "Uniform Turkic Alphabet" is wrong title for article with only image of old "New Turkic Alphabet" before 1940s.--AlefZet 18:03, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commitee for "New Turkic Alphabet" is founded in Baku in 1926, no 1930. --AlefZet 18:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then file a proposal at WP:RM. That is not a criteria for speedy deletion - speedy deletion is used for nonsense, attack pages and gibberish, not this. Baristarim 18:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's the result of joint working the Proceedings of the International Symposium of Contemporary Turkish Alphabet (Milletlerarası Çağdaş Türk Alfabeleri Sempozyumu Bildirisi), 18-20 Kasım 1991, İstanbul, M.Ü. Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü, 1992 [1]. Prime Voices in Turkic Languages are locatead in alphabets of Turkic languages... Finally Turkic Council working on the Uniform alphabet and agreed about additional 5 letters for all Turkic alphabets: Q, X, W, Ň, Ä... (For example: Turkish Newspaper - Sabah or Türk Keneşi ve Türk Dünyasının 34 Harfli Ortak Alfabe Sistemi) Or can see Jaŋalif... Almost all of the letters are located in Janalif - 1939. And also more information: Yaña imlâ and İske imlâ... Buzancar (talk) 12:55, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alphabet is not a proper noun, so should not be capitalized in the title

Even if the words in the page title remain as they are, surely the word alphabet should not be capitalized. DFH (talk) 20:34, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Common Turkic Alphabet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:37, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Common Turkic Alphabet as agreed on the conference in Baku in September 2024

The Common Turkic Alphabet as agreed on the conference in Baku, Azerbaijan in September 2024 as referenced e. g. here in The Astana Times raises some questions:

The only depiction I found is the low quality picture there (which I have enhanced, uploaded to Commons and included in the article). A slightly more extensive version is found here on Reddit, which seems to prove that a private person generated the picture. (This impression is supported by the fact that the Cyrillic equivalent shown at “Hh (НҺ)” seems to be erroneous, as Cyrillic Н is Latin N, it probably should be “Hh (Һһ)”.) Thus:
Is there a publicly available standard document which is suitable to be referenced in Wikipedia, being more relevant than press releases with inferior pictures?
Is Ä/ä considered simply as a variant of Ə\ə now (thus, it is correct now to write "İlham Äliyev" instead of "İlham Əliyev")?

Karl432 (talk) 19:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]