Talk:Come of Age

The Vaccines Come of Age or 'Come of Age'?

There is evidence pointing either way, but I believe that the title is simply Come of Age. The band's website states it as Come of Age and has no reference to The Vaccines Come of Age.

http://www.thevaccines.co.uk/gb/music/

Thanks,

Dr Scorp (talk) 23:04, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. And apparently Amazon agrees as well. Coltsfan (talk) 22:25, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 February 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. There is a consensus that the title of this album is sufficiently different from the concept of coming of age that it does not require disambiguation. As pointed out by Station1, this should have been actioned as an uncontroversial request to revert an undiscussed move. Jenks24 (talk) 09:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Come of Age (album) → Come of Age – Moved without discussion or fixing links or redirects, needs discussion Peter James (talk) 17:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter James: Too similar to coming of age; a disambiguater is needed. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It had to be entered with this capitalisation "Age", not "age", to reach this article; this along with the less common form "come of age" rather than "coming of age" may mean no primary topic, or even the album as primary. If the original title ("Come of Age") is not retained then the links to it (all intended for this article) need fixing - I've redirected the original title to the disambiguation page to make this more likely. Peter James (talk) 16:24, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To avoid link disruption, I've restored the pre-move status quo (redirecting Come of Age here) pending outcome of this discussion. Station1 (talk) 19:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revert to Come of Age. As a recent undiscussed move, this should have been automatically reverted to "Come of Age" and then an attempt to gain consensus for the move brought here. In any case, coming of age and Come of Age are different enough that there is no conflict between the two titles. Someone typing "Come [sic] of Age" with a capital "A" likely wants the album, which is a fairly popular article. A hatnote on each is sufficient to avoid any possible confusion. Station1 (talk) 19:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support returning to "Come of Age". This is the only subject of this title on Wikipedia. "Come of Age", using "Come" and capitalized "Age" does not seem like a likely search term for "coming of age", which is already distinguished in a hat note. The current setup, where "Come of Age" redirects to the current disambiguated title, means that anyone who types in or clicks on that phrase will come here anyway.--Cúchullain ^t/c 16:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose agree with Anthony Appleyard. Too similar to a term that is probably much more often searched for. The disambiguation is needed in this case. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - There is Come of age, a current redirect to "coming of age". Despite similarities/resemblances of the title, I can't find any other qualifying topics using the exact title. There is a Christian-themed book, but I could not prove its notability. Revert back to previous title by default until another topic of the exact name is proven notable. Partial matches do not qualify. George Ho (talk) 00:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.