Talk:Comandra

The taxonomy here is a bit messed up, I've found various references to the number of species and sub-species. I'm not exactly sure how to treat this. I just wanted to get the page started since it is a common species and of economic importance since it is the alternate host for the comandra blister rust. And it's got a funny name. Stealth cat 18:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to point out that the description of obligate parasites is inaccurate here as a fair number of photosynthesizing hemi-parasitic plants are still obligate parasites such as mistletoes. I believe that Comandra umbellata is in fact not obligate though. I am looking for a reliable and more recent source to confirm this. DracusBiology (talk) 09:53, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Terminology used in the reference ("semiparasitic") isn't very precisely defined (beyond "more or less parasitic"), but it's clearly not holoparasitic. Not clear if it's an obligate or facultative parasite. Changed "not obligate" to "not holoparasitic" Plantdrew (talk) 02:44, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hemiparasitic is the correct word to describe this plant and I have changed it accordingly. Wasp32 (talk) 21:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TNCStatus

@Dr vulpes I think your TNC status template may be confused since this is a genus and a species. It is not displaying currently. MtBotany (talk) 19:50, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the catch, that's my mistake when I was adding the template. I'll go back and add some logic to prevent that from happening and review my previous edits. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 20:38, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, @Dr vulpes. Your template is quite a good idea. MtBotany (talk) 20:41, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, at first I wanted to write a bot but when I submitted my request it was suggested that I do this instead and I have to admit it is a MUCH better system then having a bot update everything. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 07:36, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]