Talk:Colorado Avalanche–Detroit Red Wings brawl

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

Ice Hockey

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles

United States: Colorado

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 May 2. The result of the discussion was Keep.

It's Notable

It is still one of the most memorable brawls in sports history and probably the most memorable in hockey history.

I agree. Perhaps as time goes on, it will mean less. But right now, it continues to be a memorable moment especially for the Avalanche and the Red Wings, a notable hockey rivalry. Theaterdude88 01:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only One

I can't believe that this is the only Wikipedia arcticle about an NHL brawl. If someone would add more, maybe, that would be great. 24.83.3.54 22:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Osgood threw Roy down?

I took out a sentence that stated Osgood threw down Roy. That's nonsense. Osgood was pushing Roy back and so Roy fell against the boards. No one who saw the fight, and is objective, would have said Roy was thrown down. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.240.96.109 (talk) 23:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 10 May 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved - Although not explicit, Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ice hockey) implies titles should include the city name Mike Cline (talk) 16:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Colorado Avalanche–Detroit Red Wings brawl → Avalanche–Red Wings brawl – The Penguins–Islanders brawl was moved back to its original title after undergoing a move such as this, due to the fact that adding the geographical names was wholly unnecessary. This article should follow suit as well. 2601:282:300:98:BD92:F012:50B7:7BBD (talk) 03:07, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support for consistency. ONR (talk) 23:48, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The articles for the two teams are not at Avalanche or Red Wings, so I don't see why this should be. The current title is more easily recognizable for people who aren't intimately familiar with hockey team nick names. — Amakuru (talk) 21:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is there a guideline and/or naming convention you are trying to follow here? Something from the Manual of Style or the Ice Hockey Project perhaps? Rejectwater (talk) 06:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Oppose delighted that the above was declined WP:RECOGNIZABLE. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]