Talk:Coloman, King of Hungary/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 00:39, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Passed--¿3family6 _contribs 12:58, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Pass/Fail:

There is a citation needed tag in the paragraph dealing with the Rus campaign under the "Expansion, internal conflicts and legislation (1096–1105)" section.--¿3family6 _contribs 00:39, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging issue

Sorry, I did not notice this before, but the following images are tagged as needing a US public domain tag: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9].

3family6, thank for your review. I fixed the citation. However, I am not an expert in the field of US copyright laws, so I cannot fix the issue regarding the pictures' copyright position in the US. Borsoka (talk) 06:38, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the information, the illustrations should easily be in US public domain, since they are centuries old. Therefore, I think it would be okay if I went ahead and added the tag.--¿3family6 _contribs 12:13, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]