Jump to content

Talk:Collingwood Blues (2020)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 2 August 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Collingwood Blues (2020). While there is no consensus to move the article Collingwood Blues (2020–) to Collingwood Blues as the primary topic. The arguments for the long-term significance of the defunct team, concerns over recentism, and the suggestion to use a more conventional disambiguation format (for example, Collingwood Blues (2020)) carry significant weight. There is clear consensus to keep the disambiguation in place and move the current team to Collingwood Blues (2020) for the sake of clearer disambiguation. A hatnote pointing from this to the defunts team would also suffice. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:43, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Collingwood Blues (2020–)Collingwood Blues – The qualifying bookend "(2020–)" is unnecessary. The article relates to an existing ice hockey team. Collingwood Blues (1988–2011) is for the defunct team with the same name. The target page is currently a redirect. Buffalkill (talk) 01:22, 29 July 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). – robertsky (talk) 02:55, 2 August 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Waqar💬 14:39, 10 August 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Steel1943 (talk) 21:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that the current team is the primary topic. A disambiguation page at Collingwood Blues is probably the best solution. 162 etc. (talk) 04:11, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neither article gets a ton of traffic, but in the last 2 months Collingwood Blues (2020–) has more than double the page views. Since the redirect currently points to Collingwood Blues (1988–2011), at least some (if not most) of the traffic to that page has to be unintentional. Buffalkill (talk) 12:32, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Does Wikipedia have a convention about this sort of title format with a dash just before a closing parenthesis? To me it looks a bit strange. I would expect something like "... (2020–present)". I found only 28 titles like that on the entire English Wikipedia, so it must not be considered proper. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 14:20, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
None that I know of. I agree that the "(2020 -)" qualifier looks a bit strange, as if the team is under a deathwatch. There are many examples of new(er) sports teams choosing to take the name of a historical antecedent:
Buffalkill (talk) 18:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest that the Collingwood Blues (2020–) should be considered the primary topic. As I noted above, Collingwood Blues (2020–) has more than double the number of page views in the last 2 months, and it seems intuitive that any person looking for either of the articles would make the same assumption, that an active team would have primacy over the defunct one. I don't recommend using Collingwood Blues (2020–present), as I think it's unnecessary and inconsistent with most other articles about sports teams. Buffalkill (talk) 19:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the number of page views I note that, until a day ago, the redirect page was automatically sending readers to Collingwood Blues (1988–2011), which suggests to me that many of the page views for the defunct team's article were misdirected. There was a significant spike in views for both articles in May 2024, which was around the time when the Collingwood Blues (2020–) were winning a national championship. Buffalkill (talk) 19:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: if this doesn't pass, the title should be renamed per MOS:TOPRESENT. Gonnym (talk) 20:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note that related RMs have recently been closed at Talk:Northern League (ice hockey, 2005)#Requested move 30 July 2024 (closed 27 September 2024) and Talk:Trois-Rivières Aigles (2013)#Requested move 1 August 2024 (closed 5 September 2024). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the last 30 days, the 2020 team has been getting 12 views per day compared to 4 for the defunct team, totaling 77% of the views for the two topics. That might be enough to be considered primary for a WP:TWODABS situation, although WP:RECENTISM could be a factor. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.