Talk:CollegeHumor

The Cast of CollegeHumor

Should there be a section or a page with a list of the CollegeHumor cast? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.228.147.122 (talk) 19:38, August 8, 2011‎

Splitting Proposal for The Drawfee Show

The Drawfee Show was sold to some of the former cast members of College Humour, and has been fully independent for just over two years

So it really shouldn't be on the page anymore 2A01:4B00:E20C:6A00:91B4:A8C8:9A86:6CA7 (talk) 09:57, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

In the historical context, Drawfee started with College Humor and was made in CH offices for years, but I'm surprised there isn't a separate page for it. The fact that "Drawfee" redirects here, with only the briefest of mentions on the page, could stand correction. I'll start looking for good sources to support a separate article for it. The Drawfee fan wikia currently has 441 pages but is short on references outside the show. https://drawfee.fandom.com/wiki/Drawfee_Wiki We would need to improve on that here. JimsMaher (talk) 16:36, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

bookmark dump: JimsMaher (talk) 07:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Or JimsMaher (talk) 07:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

ok i was trying to drop the decent sources i found (14 links) here if anyone is interested. Not sure when i'd make an afternoon of writing an independent article for Drawfee, redirecting Drawfee Show too. It wouldn't be a stub with plenty to cite in describing the program/hosts/etc. JimsMaher (talk) 07:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

I agree that Drawfee should have a separate page since it has a large identity outside of the CH family nowadays. If you still have those sources I would be up for writing the new article. I’ve worked on the drawfee.fandom.com for years now. Wikipedria Editor (talk) 13:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

It's not going to win a Pulitzer, but I've started something on my sandbox page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Snowman304/sandbox @JimsMaher Snowman304|talk 07:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Merge proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Decided to spin this out from the above discussion (@NowInHD and Reil) on what CollegeHumor should be renamed as in order to look for input on if Dropout (streaming platform) should be merged into this article or if the two articles should remain separate. I've suggested some options below but feel free to add other ideas. Sariel Xilo (talk) 20:59, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

1. CollegeHumor & Dropout (streaming platform) merged → combined article renamed to Dropout (media company)
2. CollegeHumor & Dropout (streaming platform) are not merged → CollegeHumor article renamed to Dropout (media company)
3. CollegeHumor & Dropout (streaming platform) are not merged → CollegeHumor article renamed to CH Media (with lead & infobox mentioning the trade name is Dropout)

• Option A - CH Media/Connected Ventures currently uses Dropout as their trade name (per Reich above, plan on formally doing a name change in "the next few months") so I think it would reduce reader confusion to have both the production & streaming platform info in one article. My only concern is that the article could get a bit long so the shows (for both CH Originals & Dropout) might need to be WP:SPINOUT into list articles down the line. Sariel Xilo (talk) 21:21, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
• Option C, but eventually A - I think it's less upfront work, and technically more correct, if we make this CollegeHumor page a CH Media or Connected Ventures "dba Dropout" page for the time being? When they officially rename CH Media (a subsidiary of Connected Ventures?) or to Dropout, or maybe rename Connected Ventures itself to Dropout, then it'll be for sure time to combine the pages into "Dropout, the media company with an eponymous streaming platform", imo. Reil (talk) 21:52, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

In terms of the layers of holding companies, my understanding is that it was Connected Ventures at top with several subsidiaries of which CollegeHumor/CH Media was one. After CV was sold to IAC, those subsidiaries have been sold or moved out of the Connected Ventures umbrella leaving just CH Media. Regardless, this article was only ever about the one subsidiary (CollegeHumor/CH Media) so I don't think Connected Ventures needs to be in the running for possible article names. Sariel Xilo (talk) 05:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

I think the nesting doll of entities situation has simplified, but per Sam's comments, it's still Connected Ventures owns CH Media runs Dropout dot TV. CH Media plans to rename to Dropout.

Regardless! My inclination stays mostly "CH Media doing business as Dropout" situation until an official renaming, where that whole mess can be dealt with. That seems to be the state of the article's contents at the moment, save for the article name itself. Reil (talk) 19:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

• Updated Option D from below or alternatively, Option C, but also don't rename CollegeHumor, per WP:COMMONNAME, unless the common name actually changes, which we probably won't know for many months. Articles should focus on notability, rather than being structured around corporate branding, even if that corporate branding is led by Sam Reich. The most notable things in this lengthy brand history are "CollegeHumor" and the "Dropout" platform. Unless things really shift, we should have an article about each, somewhat similar to how it's structured now:
  • CollegeHumor, focused on the 2 decades of history with a lengthy summary of the transition to Dropout, including the corporate history, but only a bit of summary about the streaming platform or its original shows. Those areas should link to the latter article.
  • Dropout (streaming platform) should be structured pretty close to how it is now, perhaps moving some of the summaries of original shows from CollegeHumor over.

—siroχo 02:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

I don't actually think CollegeHumor has been the common name for a while; they shuttered the CollegeHumor website & had it redirect to the CollegeHumor YouTube Channel after a slow decline. Once Dropout launched in 2018, all the content they've created has been for that platform and then sliced up for other platforms (such as the CollegeHumor YouTube Channel) with Dropout branding. My understanding is that the YouTube Channel was basically the last platform with the "CollegeHumor" name and per coverage, fans had primarily been using Dropout so this "rebrand" was mostly a formality. There was a spike in using "CollegeHumor" & "CH Media" in 2020 during the sale to Reich. However, since then, most of the reliable coverage has been using Dropout when talking about work done by the company & has continued to do so after the latest announcement so per WP:NAMECHANGES: if the reliable sources written after the change is announced routinely use the new name, Wikipedia should follow suit and change relevant titles to match. Sariel Xilo (talk) 05:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Agree with @Sariel Xilo here. People might use "CollegeHumor" to talk about the entity's previous work, but no one really refers to the current entity as anything other than "Dropout", that I see. Reil (talk) 18:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This proposal has been listed at the following projects: WikiProject Comedy, WikiProject Internet culture, and WikiProject Websites. Sariel Xilo (talk) 19:43, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Agree also; Dropout is definitely the common name today. I also think a merge would be too bloated, and would support Option B or C.--ERAGON (talk) 12:36, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

• Option D, reduce this article to being Collegehumor and limit to pre-buyout, merge the content of this article from post buyout (so 2020 onwards) into the Dropout article and rename that Dropout (media company). I would go with an Option A but I think the history of the company is too long in the tooth to be easily condensed to the point of being a single article for both and document the history of it. Given the uniformity of branding now I don't think it's entirely unwarranted or problematic to use chronology as the splitting point rather than corporate vs streaming service as suggested, so to me having an article for Collegehumor up to 2020 and then Dropout as everything post that makes sense. Apache287 (talk) 20:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

  Agree with Option D. While Dropout is the successor to CollegeHumor, it's a very different company. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 15:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

  I oppose this option because Dropout and CollegeHumor are the same company with one history. Sam Reich became the company's Director of Original Content in 2006 and led the company's pivot towards video. The type & format of videos has changed over time (with the streaming service being the latest iteration of this) but it has always been led by Reich who now owns the company. There are lots of articles on companies with long histories where the name/ownership has changed over time; I don't see how this article would be any different. Sariel Xilo (talk) 16:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

  While we don't automatically split articles over changes in name or ownership, it is also not unprecedented, see Twitter, Inc and X Corp. for example. The company itself says that the new name represents its new identity. They're now entirely focused on the streaming service. Also, Reich has not always led the company. He didn't even join the company until 7 years after its founding. Even after being promoted to Chief Creative Officer, he didn't take over the business side of the company until he bought it. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 17:08, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

  I !voted above, but I am also happy with this proposed option D. I think it's fine to include a summary section about CollegeHumor in the Dropout article, as well. —siroχo 10:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Note: Initiated a formal request for closure at Wikipedia:Closure requests#Talk:CollegeHumor#Merge proposal Sariel Xilo (talk) 00:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.