Talk:Cold Start (military doctrine)

India: Politics Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as High-importance).

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia / Post-Cold War B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

DELETION REQUEST

Kindly refer to these links where the Indian army Chief has stated that there is nothing called cold start.

http://www.ndtv.com/article/wikileaks%20revelations/india-has-no-cold-start-doctrine-army-chief-70159

http://www.google.com/search?client=ubuntu&channel=fs&q=India+has+no+%27Cold+Start%27+doctrine%3A+Army+chief%3A+%22There+is+nothing+called+%27Cold+Start%27+%28doctrine%29+in+the+Indian+Army.+We+don%27t+have+anything+called+%27Cold+Start%27%2C%22+he+said+while+reacting+to+WikiLeaks+documents+in+which+US+Ambassador+Timothy+Roemer+analyses+India%27s+military+approach+towards+Pakistan+in+the+wake+of+26%2F11+attacks.&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.237.188.117 (talk) 06:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, before add deletion tags, read the relevant policy!

Wikipedia's content is not establish by the Indian Military. Moreover the article is older than the last Wikileaks. I think the article is relevant and deserve a page. Le reference unfortunately are missing.--Dia^ (talk) 14:15, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's content isn't also supposed to be edited by anti-india fanatics by providing no ref links and posting jingoistic contentCrusaderbot (talk) 05:32, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above (dated) deletion request does not display a firm grasp of the issues at play. Although the Indian military has publicly disavowed the existence of a single concept called "Cold Start," they are certainly embracing various "proactive strategies" in the mould of CS, as indicated here: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Army-chief-General-Suhag-says-India-needs-to-be-ready-for-short-wars/articleshow/48765472.cms — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.233.116.48 (talk) 12:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clean Up

Hi. I'm planning to do clean up of this article soon, which will hopefully leave the article in better shape. Just FYI for those interested. Chocolate Horlicks (talk) 15:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, turns out that I'm too lazy. Chocolate Horlicks (talk) 12:42, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

High time for the clean up! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.2.20.52 (talk) 19:56, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Improving this article

I'm improving this article in terms of style and language; please provide relevant feedback The words 'Eastern Pakistan' should not redirect to the former the province of East Pakistan(Bangladesh) Indianelectron (talk) 06:34, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Impact Section Changes

Made minor modifications to grammar and sentence structure in this section (Impact). 70.81.66.126 (talk) 04:35, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Cold Start (military doctrine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]