Talk:Cold Cathode Gauge Experiment

A fact from Cold Cathode Gauge Experiment appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 January 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Cold Cathode Gauge Experiment could detect gases leaking from an astronaut's life support systems on the Moon's surface?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cold Cathode Gauge Experiment.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by DirtyHarry991 talk 02:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Cold Cathode Gauge Experiment could detect gases leaking from an astronaut's life support systems on the Moon's surface? Source: https://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/as12psr.pdf - Page 96
ALT 1... that the Cold Cathode Gauge Experiment proved that the Moon had a tenuous atmosphere, derived from the solar wind? Source: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19740021148/downloads/19740021148.pdf - Page 3
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/LGBT_and_Wikipedia

Created by Seddon (talk). Self-nominated at 00:29, 18 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Cold Cathode Gauge Experiment; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

I'll review this. Article is new and long enough. It doesn't seem to have any sourcing or neutrality issues, and is generally presentable. (The lede seems especially short but that's not too big of an issue.) The first hook seems a little more interesting, and the sourcing checks out! QPQ checks out as well. All seems good to go here. Generalissima (talk) 03:50, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Unpromoted because of citation needed tags. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I've repeated the citation for the end of that paragraph.[1] A note though is that other usages of references 1 & 3 could also benefit from page numbers. That is likely not a dealbreaker for WP:V since both sources can be searched, Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 02:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've readded this entry to the DYK nom page. Citation needed tags were removed. Seddon ^talk 00:56, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Generalissima and AirshipJungleman29: Looks like the bot is treating this as approved so wanted to ping to resolve. Seddon ^talk 01:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks like the citation needed tags are gone, so should be good again. Generalissima (talk) 02:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]