Talk:Coins of the Austro-Hungarian gulden
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Coins of the Austro-Hungarian gulden article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Unreferenced articles | ||||
|
Merger proposal
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- To not merge, given that the topic are independently notable, and consistent with the structure of other similar articles. Klbrain (talk) 20:42, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
I proposed to merge Coins of the Austro-Hungarian gulden into Austro-Hungarian Gulden because Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept. JaneciaTaylor (talk) 21:39, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support - Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and Coins of the Austro-Hungarian gulden has been unsourced since November 2006. 🌺Kori🌺 - (@) 03:21, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose merger. This article follows the standard for coin articles set out in Wikipedia:WikiProject Numismatics/Style, and we have quite a number of them, please see Special:PrefixIndex:Coins of the. The nominator's rationale is copy-pasted from WP:MERGEREASON, and is not convincing. This article is not a WP:DICDEF, and it is no longer unsourced, since I added the first citation. Sam Sailor 07:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose merger. This article does not at all resemble a dictionary entry, instead, fits into the structure of articles described in Wikipedia:WikiProject Numismatics/Style. Timur lenk (talk) 22:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.