Talk:Cock ring/Archive 1

Archive 1

comment

I no longer wish my picture to be displayed. I do not agree for the picture to be used in the public domain.Abcd12345 (talk) 20:59, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

comment

The before/after picture should not be put onto the page again. It shows no differnce in before/after therefore does very little to support what the article is stating. It's not a valuable photo to have. 79.69.166.78 (talk) 00:44, 19 October 2008 (UTC)79.69.166.78 (talk) 00:43, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, Wikipedia is not censored. If you have a better picture we can consider replacing it. -- Banjeboi 00:45, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

I agree the picture should be removed. It is not useful as it does not clearly illustrate what is going on. No picture is better than a picture that is not useful. --Hdstubbs (talk) 16:54, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Agreed*2. If there is a useful picture, sure, let's have it. This one just isn't it. HalJor (talk) 18:53, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

comment

Removed the comment: [I don't know anything about cock rings, but other sites say to put them around the penis AND SCROTUM.] This more properly belongs in the talk/discussion area. Added wording to the definition to expand what the author intended. --Zotdragon 13:26, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Photo

The first picture is disgusting! Remove it, please! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.68.107.197 (talk) 13:54, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

Then don't look at it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.210.114.16 (talk) 01:35, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

photo again

Why was Cockringbeforeafter picture removed ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.2.112 (talk) 02:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

In my opinion the picture doesn't work--I really can't see a difference in size, except maybe for the blood vessels bulging a little more. AdRock (talk) 04:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

There is a difference, look at the glans. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.197.126.228 (talk) 12:41, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

If you have a better photo we are always looking to improve articles. Banjeboi 17:38, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Picture Restored

Remember Wikipedia is not censored. If you do not like it , do not look at it. Changing or blanking out pictures without discussion is considered vandalism and may eventually get you blocked from editing. JasonHockeyGuy (talk) 06:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

why are there so many gay guys on wikipedia? you dont need to show a cock in order to explain a cock ring, its just that you WANT to show the cock. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.191.222.101 (talk) 03:03, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Medicine

Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Assessment#Is_WPMED_the_correct_WikiProject_to_support_this_article.3F, under "Probably no".

I know; it wasn't you. It was the same anon that spams WPMED's banner plus half a dozen others to just about every page s/he can think of any even slightly plausible tangential connection. But perhaps this note will discourage the anon from re-adding it. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:07, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Impropriety

There is a certain level of propriety on reputable Internet sites which prohibit nudity beyond a certain level due to the very high number of children who frequent the Internet. Genetalia in the appropriate medical context, basic human anatomony has long been considered acceptable. Pierced genetalia and cock rings cross that line. What's next? Lesbian tranny bondage/torture with strap-ons?

If you're going to post anything beyond "Genetalia in the appropriate medical context, basic human anatomony," then please make use of an age verification system.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.239.117 (talk) 18:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Note that wikipedia is not censored and this is unlikely to change. If you truly object to the images, consider signing up for an account and opting to have certain images flagged as problematic blocked - see WP:NOSEE for details. This is the result long discussion and consensus, and the only option you have is to sign up to an individual account that will not show certain images. There is no system-wide option that can or will be applied. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 02:00, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

I do not feel that this should even be an article. I have the highest parental controls on my computer but I can still see this page. I do not feel like this is an article that any child should be able to come across. I'm sure this topic has been discussed somewhere already, not just about this article but about many other similar articles. Can someone please show me where? I would like to be part of the discussion but I would like to be up to speed before I do. Thank you.Emely1219 (talk) 21:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

You can start by looking at WP:CENSOR. Exploding Boy (talk) 21:54, 16 June 2009 (UTC)