Jump to content

Talk:Coccinia grandis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:40, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

[edit]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 20:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 18:44, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coccinia grandis → Ivy gourd – As per WP:COMMON NAME ( eg: Guinea pig (not Cavia porcellus)). 'Ivy gourd' is the common popular name. http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=COGR9
http://www.weeds.org.au/cgi-bin/weedident.cgi?tpl=plant.tpl&ibra=all&card=V25
http://www.medicinenet.com/ivy_gourd/supplements-vitamins.htm
http://www.ehow.co.uk/list_7849706_ivy-gourd-seeds.html

Anish Viswa 03:15, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:FLORA. The most commonly used name in reliable sources is Coccinia grandis (more hits in a Google Book and Scholar search than "ivy gourd"). Rkitko (talk) 22:26, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. My understanding of Common Name is the name used by common man to refer to something and common man mostly use 'Ivy Gourd' and not the botanical name. Common man do not know the Scientific names. Also, this is a common vegetable and hence the common name is popular.
Anish Viswa 01:08, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is a common misconception. It specifically states, "...it prefers to use the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources." In this case, that's the scientific name. In other cases, that's the vernacular name. (When we say "common name" in reference to names plants and animals are known by, we means it's a name used in the vernacular, not that it's the most commonly used name.) Rkitko (talk) 01:36, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe support (combined with some changes to the taxobox about which species are covered) but needs more investigation. The first google scholar hit for "ivy gourd" glosses ivy gourd as "Coccinia grandis Voigt, Coccinia cordifolia, Coccinia indica". Other hits in the top screen or two point to Coccinia indica, Coccinia grandix (a typo/error?), Coccinia cordifolia or Coccinia grandis. In other words, it may be analogous to the "rice" example in WP:FLORA. Kingdon (talk) 23:00, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kingdon, as far as I can tell, all of the information in this article is about this particular species, not "ivy gourd" as a common name. If multiple species are called ivy gourd, then that bolsters the argument to keep the article titled at the scientific name. An article on ivy gourd should not have a taxobox because the species you mentioned do not seem to form a natural taxon, much like rice does not have a taxobox. What I would prefer to see is a disambiguation page if these names are real species. From a few searches I've done, C. cordifolia and C. indica appear to be considered synonyms of C. grandis. Rkitko (talk) 15:05, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
All three are indeed synonyms according to GRIN. Kingdon (talk) 01:34, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

"Rashmati"

[edit]

If "rashmati" is another word for the fruit, could the word be introduced at top where all the names are given? If not, at least maybe specify what language/culture this word is from. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 01:19, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For which fruit. Is it name of Ivy Guord. Alshaikhan (talk) 15:09, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Coccinia grandis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coccinia grandis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:52, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Coccinia grandis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:16, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest moving information from 'Geographic Spread' to introductory paragraph + Add to Bushfood page + Add to Bush Tucker page query

[edit]

Most of the plant/tree pages I've been reading have the information on where the plant/tree is native and its distribution, including if it's recognised as an invasive species, in the introductory paragraph.

May I suggest for consistency that this information from the 'Geographic Spread' section be moved to the introductory paragraph.

Is this a "bushfood?" If so, may I suggest adding a link at the bottom of the page to the "Bushfood" page, and add the plant to the "Bushfood" page.

I note that it says, "Its native range extends from Africa to Asia... and the Northern Territories, Australia." Do we have evidence that it's a "Bush tucker" plant? If so, may I suggest adding a note under "See Also" that it's a bush tucker plant, add a link to the "Bush Tucker" page, and then add the plant to the "Bush Tucker" page.

Tzali (talk) 17:47, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Coccinia_grandis&oldid=1256783969"