Jump to content

Talk:Coalition combat operations in Afghanistan in 2006

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

The article War in Afghanistan (2001–present) was getting very big, far bigger than the recommended wikipedia length. As other phases of the war had separate articles, I thought the NATO mission (of which there is more detail that could go on), warranted its own article. Also no doubt the nature of operations in Afghanistan in 2007 may well change. I have called it Coalition combat operations in Afghanistan in 2006 to recognise that not all western forces (in particular US) operate under NATO control and to exclude ISAF forces in the north not involved in combat operations. Chwyatt 11:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

order of battle

[edit]

Add an order of battle as troop units will no doubt change in 2007 Chwyatt 13:53, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flags

[edit]

What is the best way to list flags? I have currently listed them in terms of who has largest number of troops at the top (only in the south) rather than alphabetically. Chwyatt 17:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

year in Afghanistan

[edit]

I have been tidying up the years on Afghanistan 2001 in Afghanistan / 2002 in Afghanistan / 2003 in Afghanistan / 2004in Afghanistan and have bought them all back to there own individual pages. They were across many month pages, with very little useful info. Now they still need to be tidied up, and extranaeous info removed. However, I did notice that 2006 / 2007 / 2008 we had completely changed the format. Anybody know why? Should we create the articles for 2005 in Afghanistan / 2006 in Afghanistan / 2007 in Afghanistan / 2008 in Afghanistan / 2009 in Afghanistan ?? Jez t e C 21:26, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canadian soldiers during Operation Medusa.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Canadian soldiers during Operation Medusa.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:02, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Coalition combat operations in Afghanistan in 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:44, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Coalition combat operations in Afghanistan in 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why did the US troops leave Afghanistan?

[edit]

It says, "From January 2006, a NATO International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) force started to replace U.S. troops in southern Afghanistan as part of Operation Enduring Freedom."

This is iterated on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_War_in_Afghanistan_(2001%E2%80%93present)

Why? Why did the USA leave Afghanistan? I have noticed similar things on Wikipedia entries on the Iraq and Syrian wars. I would go as far as to say that I have found this to be typical of history schoolbooks. History, as told, is just a string of random, uncaused events. Shit just happens. I do understand that history schoolbooks have to leave things--lots of things--out.

I write this as a reader trying to understand. The USA leaves southern Afghanistan during a period described as "2003–2005 Taliban resurgence, war with Afghan forces" elsewhere. This is not a small why. This is a WTF! As a reader you would rather expect a surge, but get the exact opposite. Was it because of political pressure? I made that up, but the question remains. Why?

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Coalition_combat_operations_in_Afghanistan_in_2006&oldid=1195317849"