Talk:Coalition Government of Democratic Kampuchea

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia Mid‑importance

Coalition Government of Democratic Kampuchea is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I don't have a source at hand, but I've read that Sihanouk actually left the coalition in 1987 or 1988, after talks with the pro-Vietnam administration. --Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 15:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sihanouk resigned in early 1988 so that he could engage in discussions with Hun Sen which were brokered by France and the Soviet Union, as per Elizabeth Becker in When the War was Over,. Thanks for pointing this out; worth including. Cmacauley (talk) 15:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disorienting Acronyms

The use of all these acronyms is confusing, for the right wing rebel groups can we designate the term royalist and nationalist before the acronym to designate the faction the body is part of. --J intela (talk) 07:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History

Fixed the citation needed, which was rightly added as the comment turned out to be dead wrong. I changed the paragraph around a bit to fit what the references said. Drunkenduncan (talk) 11:36, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good job, thanks! Cmacauley (talk) 15:50, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of real territorial control

Should the article stress even more that this "government" actually governed nothing; it had international recognition but no real control of the country on the ground? I realize that this is pretty much the definition of a "government in exhile" but the concept is probably not particularly familiar to younger readers as there are generally far fewer of them now that there were 50-75 years ago. 2600:1004:B15F:1925:596A:5C92:BAB3:151C (talk) 00:28, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Coat of arms of CGDB.svg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:37, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UN General Assembly Votes about KR and CGDK seat in UN

"91 rejected the proposal, there were 29 countries in favour and 26 abstentions. In contrast, the results in 1981 had been 77–37–31" The UN votes for this article seem to contradict the article of Democratic Kampuchea which states "The UN General Assembly voted by a margin of 71 to 35 for the KR to retain their seat at the UN, with 34 abstentions and 12 absentees."

I am unfortunately unable to access the sources listed to double check the statistics and am currently searching online for a suitable source. Is anyone able to fact check these stats? Dafatskin (talk) 13:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]