Talk:Cloverdale Rodeo and Country Fair

Equine Low‑importance

	Horses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Vancouver Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Vancouver (assessed as Low-importance).

Rodeo (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rodeo, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.RodeoWikipedia:WikiProject RodeoTemplate:WikiProject RodeoRodeo articles

History

Does anyone have any actual evidence that the rodeo started in 1945? I've lived there since 1944 and I'm pretty sure there was no rodeo until 1948. The fair was around long before '48, but no rodeo. - 205.193.82.252 18:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citations=

I see no citation anywhere in this entire article except for one instance. And the only section tagged is the only one with the citation. Can someone explain the discrepancy? How are the editors assuming that all the other text without references are true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elliemaejellybean (talk • contribs)

You are correct in that the entire article should be properly referenced; if you want, you are welcome to move the tag to the top of the page. As for the discrepancy, however, it is important to note that certain types of information have a more urgent need for proper references than others. "Controversy" sections, by their very nature, tend to accumulate information that can be damaging in nature to the subject. It is one thing to add the start date of the rodeo without a good reference - the organization probably won't be damaged by that. On the other hand, however, accusations of animal cruelty can do a lot of damage if untrue, and as such need to be well-supported by reliable third-party sources. Hope this helps. --Ckatz^chat _spy 20:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. However, the Cloverdale Rodeo actually admits that they inflict cruelty on animals and as a result removed half of all their events. This(dropping all roping events)is a huge deal and will change the 61 year old organization forever. Perhaps it should go under the History section?

You will still need sources, so the tag has been restored. Please don't remove it unless citations are provided. --Ckatz^chat _spy 07:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cloverdalerodeo.jpg

Image:Cloverdalerodeo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cloverdale Rodeo and Country Fair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060208110740/http://www.cloverdalerodeo.com/index.html to http://www.cloverdalerodeo.com/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's a live link that works, I replaced the archive. I will check back later to see if it's sporadic. dawnleelynn^(talk) 19:34, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]