Talk:Cleito (mythology)

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

-= Cleito Identified as Hatshepsut =-

Cleito is a corruption of the name Maat-ka-re.

https://www.academia.edu/114005344/Manifesting_with_Manetho_Finding_commonality_from_Platos_Atlantis_and_Egyptian_Sources
Poseidon and Athena:
And the Names of Poseidon and Athena can also be deciphered at this same timeframe:
Leukippe(kheper) + Eu-en-or = Aa-kheper-en-re(Thutmose 2 - Poseidon)
+ Cleito(krt)=(Ma)at-ka- re(Hatshepsut – Athena).

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.55.96.50 (talk • contribs)

The author of that paper does not appear to have any qualifications in the area, just being an interested amateur. Their theories, while you may find them interesting, shouldn't be added to the article. – Michael Aurel (talk) 21:19, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]