Talk:Clearnet (networking)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Clearnet (networking) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Atticusbixby.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Dicdef
[edit]Article is currently a WP:DICDEF. Rewording to "Clearnet is the part of the web..." rather than "a term for" would help, but I'm skeptical this has broad support (since I've never heard of it until now). Might be best to redirect this and include what little material there is in the Darknet article? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Will try and get some more citations, will turn into a dictionary term if it's still no good afterwards. Deku-shrub (talk) 08:54, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
The term dates to at least as early as 2010. I would include that citation, but it only exists inside Freenet. I may try and find a stable clearnet portal that I can use to provide a link. As an aside, there has actually been some work within the Freenet community to find the earlier, documentable uses of the word, because most of us remember hearing it much before then. Smartyhall (talk) 04:58, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Non-traditional
[edit]@X1\: Greetings! Regarding this edit: [1]...forgive me if I'm missing something incredibly obvious, but my understanding of what you are saying is:
- The surface web is indexed by standard search engines
- The clearnet is indexed by standard search engines
- The clearnet is indexed by traditional search engines
The article seemed to be saying "the clearnet is not indexed by traditional search engines", which is why I removed the negation. Am I misunderstanding something? Thanks. -- Beland (talk) 02:50, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Beland: maybe I am misunderstanding something. The run-on sentence confuses me. I've self-reverted an will leave it at that. X1\ (talk) 20:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- OK, I attempted to clarify. -- Beland (talk) 04:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
File:Deepweb graphical representation.svg
[edit]@Deku-shrub: please elaborate, instead of just an ES of "wrong". X1\ (talk) 20:15, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Note: see related edit at Deep web article and Commons discussion (below). X1\ (talk) 21:43, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Note: see related discussion at commons:File talk:Deepweb graphical representation.svg. X1\ (talk) 22:30, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:37, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- Stub-Class Computer networking articles
- Unknown-importance Computer networking articles
- Stub-Class Computer networking articles of Unknown-importance
- All Computer networking articles
- All Computing articles
- Stub-Class Internet articles
- Unknown-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles