Talk:Clapham Junction (area)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | On 19 June 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Clapham Junction to Clapham Junction (area). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 19 June 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Clapham Junction → Clapham Junction (area) – This is a very clear scenario where the area is named after the train station, not the other way round. At least the first two pages on Google for "Clapham Junction" [1] are about the station, not the area. The station is clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Then we can redirect this page to Clapham Junction railway station as I'm pretty sure it's a naming convention to put "station"/"railway station" after a station name on Wikipedia (even for "junction" stations). —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 18:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom and redirect Clapham Junction to Clapham Junction railway station as clear primary redirect. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:53, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support the area has 639 views but the station has 3,628 and the film has 792[[2]] I'd suggest moving the DAB page to the base name as no clear primary topic without "railway station". Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:41, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.