Talk:City of London Club

This former club is now merely a marketing ploy; its premises are used only for commercial "function" catering, and there is effectively no membership facilities or activity Jezza (talk) 20:56, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

It is still a Members Club; I know Jezza is wrong because the procedures for membership are the same as any other club. I am under consideration and it requires at least six sponsors personally known by an applicant for the Committee to even consider an election. The club has always been a luncheon club because of the lack of activty in the City in the evenings - compare the City University Club, and it is a far cry from being just a front as the members still govern it and are elected. Like most of the clubs it has to find income and revenue from other sources. This is not the case with the St Stephen's Club or the London Capital Club. Tony S212.139.232.31 (talk) 12:25, 27 December 2011 (UTC)