User talk:Jezzabr
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.
Remember to place any articles you create into a category so we don't get orphans.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.
Redwolf24 (Talk) 18:33, 27 July 2005 (UTC) The current date and time is 10 November 2024 T 21:45 UTC.
P.S. I like messages :-P
The Honourable Schoolboy
[edit]Hi, unfortunately I don't understand the following: '("The Honourable...Esq." is an instantly significant social solecism.)' in The Honourable Schoolboy. Could you add some explanation? Thanks! Rich 07:03, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Neither "The Honourable" nor "Mr." is ever used with "Esquire". One of the impenetrable defences of a social code is its complex unwritten rules: outsiders will egregiously break a rule whose very existence they may never suspect. Other outsiders may be misled, but the insider quietly takes note, giving no indication to the impostor who may think that he "fits in" and has been accepted.
(For example, I have no idea how to send you this response to your query, from which you may immediately see that I am not a true Wikipaede!) Jezza 09:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Good answer, thanks. Now I inkle that much goes on in the book(and Britain)that I don't sense. Rich 11:34, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi!
[edit]Hello and welcome again, I was just testing some new stuff of mine patrolling the recent changes, and by the way I want to thank you for your recent contributions, I hope yu find this place comfortable and find your way arround. If you need a more specialized help (more direct and dinamic), you can find here a list of all available users to help being mentors (for the poject of ...adopt a user...). There, You can find me as one of them, and whether you decide to be adopted or not, you can always send me a message to help you in anything. Nice editing!! - ☩Damërung ☩. -- 19:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Good work on case law
[edit]I like what you've done with it - it's a significant improvement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawdroid (talk • contribs) 22:31, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edit re "Virtual Past Masters"
[edit]Just a technicallity ... but the entire York Rite does not exist in the UK (the Mark Master degree and Royal Arch degree exist, but are not conferred by the York Rite)... however, the York Rite does exist in other countries, and they do confer the VPM degree. So it isn't just in America. Blueboar (talk) 23:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
I must beg to differ. Your "York Rite" exists and is widely worked (but referred to only as "The Rose Croix", after the most usual degree) under a Supreme Council chartered by the US Southern Jurisdiction. However the highest degrees are much more exclusive.
The primacy of the northern city of York, in both the Church of England and English Masonry, was historically a sensitive political lost cause. Jezza (talk) 22:36, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Cradock
[edit]Thumbs up to your changes to an important article, congrats. Ericoides (talk) 15:59, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Chairman
[edit]I've reverted your recent edits to the Chairman article. The material was good, but some of it put words in the mouth of one of the cited references (Robert's Rules of Order). I think your material would fit into a much-needed new section on "Duties", which might go right before the "Corporate governance" section. The latter is pretty weak, IMHO. I would have tried to put your materials into a Duties section, but thought that you might do a better job of it. If you don't want to do it, I'll try to come back later and have a go at it. Lou Sander (talk) 02:17, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Christopher Wren GA Nomination
[edit]I have nominated Christopher Wren for GA status. As you're one of the main editors, would you be willing to help improve the article to meet GA requirements? Thanks, GoldRock23(talk - my page - contribs) 15:40, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
South Moreton
[edit]Thankyou for your contributions on South Moreton. However, some of your contributions lacked what Wikipedians call neutral point of view and necessary citations. I have therefore reverted some of those that might be considered more contentious and modified some others. I apologise if this seems heavy-handed. Some of the statements that I deleted might be reinstated — but only with the addition of citations that verify them.
Your edit summary that includes the phrase "parish council dysfunctional" may not be advisable either, particularly as edit summaries are not a place where citations can be included for verification or text can be amended afterwards!
The article is still rather short of inline citations, and some of the citations that you have helpfully added give so few details of the articles cited that other users might find it hard to trace them and verify your sources. I generally use templates such as Template:Cite news, Template:Cite book, Template:Cite web and so on, not only to maintain a standard format but also because the parameters serve as a checklist for me to remember all the details that I ought to supply if at all possible.
Please continue to contribute to South Moreton if you can. There is plenty more to say about the village that can be justified as encyclopaedic, so the article deserves development and expansion.
I recognise that St John's church is rarely open for worship, but is it ever open for visitors? I photographed the outside and uploaded a set of photos to Wikimedia, but when I visited I found the church locked so I couldn't photograph the interior. I've added many photos of other parish church interiors to Wikimedia (e.g. Ickford, Rousham, Yarnton etc.), but South Moreton has so far eluded me.
Best wishes, Motacilla (talk) 06:07, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 21:45, Sunday, November 10, 2024 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 21:45, Sunday, November 10, 2024 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Jezzabr! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 20:37, Saturday, August 8, 2015 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
December 2015
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Soho may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Soho drug dealers jailed|work=Metropolitan Police Service|date=19 Aug 2013|accessdate=6 August 2015}}</ref>Soho continues to be a centre of the [[sex industry]] in London, and features numerous
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Soho may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Soho drug dealers jailed|work=Metropolitan Police Service|date=19 Aug 2013|accessdate=6 August 2015}}</ref>Soho continues to be a centre of the [[sex industry]] in London, and features numerous
- Lord Chamberlain's Office]] until the [[Theatres Act 1968|Theatres Act of 1968]] became law). It claimed that it was the only theatre in London which Never Closed during the War, <ref>{{cite
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:00, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 21
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Soho, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Listed and Paul Raymond. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 28
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ernst & Young, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Four. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Jezzabr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Jezzabr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)