Jump to content

Talk:Cistus ladanifer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think this image is not Cistus ladanifer. It is - may be - Cistus laurifolius. --Gnomon Kelemen 09:19, August 12, 2005 (UTC)

Changed to a different pic - MPF 17:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is this really an ornamental plant? It is just about the ugliest plant you can find, except the one week during which it flowers a year.--Burgas00 17:12, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The basic ladanifer is indeed a bit gawky. However, the sulcatus variety (the cistus formerly known as C.palhinhae) is very attractive, compact and quite frost-resistant (here in England anyway) and the appearance of the spectacular flowers (albeit briefly as you say) is the icing on the cake. Dayfield (talk) 19:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are the medicinal uses of the cistus ladanifer? Please not the uses in perfumery, just the medicinal ones. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.74.232 (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]