Talk:Cincinnati riots of 1841

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

1840 or 1841?

An article in Fraser's Magazine (November 1852) on Harriet Beecher Stowe reports she was profoundly affected by a violent race riot which took place in Cincinnati in '1840'. Is this just a misprint for 1841, or were there two riots in consecutive years? The article describes the whites as using a cannon on this occasion too.RLamb (talk) 20:24, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There were also Cincinnati Riots of 1836, and Harriet Beecher Stowe commented on them [1]. Quite possibly there were other riots in 1840, but I suspect that Fraser's Magazine got the year wrong. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:33, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was thinking of adding a quote from this article [2] as background to the 1841 riot, but I'm not sure about it. It was first published in a British magazine eleven years after the events; it description of the riot diverges from the sourced account; the author doesn't identify himself beyond 'An Alabama Man'; and he's not claiming ever to have been in Cincinnati himself. He does write as if he knows some of the Stowes personally, but even if Mrs Stowe was his source she wasn't a direct eyewitness of the violence: he only claims she was there, at a distance, and helped and spoke with survivors. He claims this particular riot had a critical impact on her, but if her surviving papers never even mention it, only the '36 riot - well, it makes you wonder whether 'An Alabama Man' got more than the year wrong? RLamb (talk) 07:42, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Fraser's source says "The terrible and dramatic scenes which occurred in Cincinnati between 1835 and 1847 ... The abolition press established there in 1835 ...". This source, which is contemporary, says the press was established in January 1836. There do seem to have been repeated riots, but I think the Fraser's source is talking about the 1841 riots. It is a bit confused. I would be inclined not to use it. Aymatth2 (talk) 11:59, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Not really verifiable. RLamb (talk) 16:03, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request, in conformity with WP:LOWERCASE and WP:CAPS.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 11:39, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

– To stay consistent with the MOS and with the titles of other Cincinnati riots articles (seen here), the "R" in "Riots" should be lowercase. Both of the new pages already exist, but they are just redirects to the current pages. Oxguy3 t c 21:31, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As the editor who started this string of articles I support the moves. The titles should be consistent. Aymatth2 (talk) 00:09, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Not a proper noun. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 23:59, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.