Talk:Church of Analco, Puebla

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Church of Analco, Puebla article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism Low‑importance

Church of Analco, Puebla is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Tenryuu, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on February 7–10, 2020.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title

Templo de Analco may be a better title for this article (I'm not sure), but I've redirected the page to Templo del Santo Ángel Custodio de Analco (the name displayed on the plaque outside the church) for now. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:37, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@BrugesFR: Curious if you have any thoughts? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:07, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer: The churches in the english wikipedia are titled by churches, so I consider in my opinion that it should be called Church of Santo Ángel Custodio de Analco, and we place in the article its corresponding Spanish name. The original names of places in mexico were changed after the colony. In my opinion they should be called churches, temple can be any place of prayer for anyone who has passed through the Earth or any religion. In addition, to avoid confusion with pre columbian temples is should to call the churches in my opinion. What do you think?--BrugesFR (talk) 22:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BrugesFR, I don't know, honestly, which is why I'm fine with whatever other editors think is best. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion

@Nancystodd: Thanks for expanding this article! I hope you'll consider promoting to Good article status. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 02:19, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer: Thanks for your edits! I was wondering about the gallery myself, but I wasn't sure how best to resolve it. It does look better the way you set it up. I am working on another section that I haven't finished yet and should be posting sometime this weekend. Translating doesn't take long, but finding appropriate references to support what is included takes a bit longer! The original article in Spanish does not have valid references for all the content in it. In any case, when I am done with that, I'll add this article to the list for reassessment. ---Nancystodd (talk) 22:42, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nancystodd, Wonderful! Looking forward. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:42, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if these are applicable:

---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:21, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nancystodd: A few edits were made ahead of the copy edit I've request from the Guid of Copy Editors. I mean no offense, I request these all the time, especially for articles I think have potential to be promoted to Good article status. I invite you to please review these changes. Thanks again for your work here! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:15, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template

@Jonesey95: Thanks for your recent edit. Do you know if this is being used correctly in the infobox? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:20, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the infobox's code output at Special:ExpandTemplates, it looks fine to me, but I can never remember the nuances of MOS when it comes to italicizing proper names or not. Depending on where you look in MOS, the guidance is difference. I would leave it as is unless someone complains. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:23, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jonesey95, Thanks. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:15, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]