Talk:Chrysonilia sitophila

Same as Neurospora sitophila?

Hello Marvoir. iNaturalist suggests that Chrysonilia sitophila and Neurospora sitophila are the same. Perhaps we should rename this article to Neurospora sitophila, since we have an article and a taxonomy template for Neurospora? –Novem Linguae (talk) 08:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Our article says : "Chrysonilia sitophila is the anamorphic counterpart of Neurospora sitophila (teleomorph)" Is it really necessary to rename this article ? "Chrysonilia sitophila" had a greater historical role than the teleomorphic form "Neurospora sitophila". By the way, iNaturalist is identical to the French Wikipedia article from which I translated our article. Marvoir (talk) 09:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me that iNaturalist 1) thinks they are the same, and 2) has deprecated Chrysonilia sitophila. Screenshot with Chrysonilia sitophila crossed out. I'm not an expert though, could be misreading something, but that is what I am seeing, so figured I'd start a discussion. –Novem Linguae (talk) 15:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Novem Linguae: you are correct, I have entered a move request. @Marvoir: articles for taxons on English Wikipedia should use the senior synonym as the page title. YorkshireExpat (talk) 17:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 March 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved as requested Mike Cline (talk) 11:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chrysonilia sitophila → Neurospora sitophila – According to this, Chrysonilia sitophila is a junior synonym of Neurospora sitophila, and article names for taxons should use the senior synonym. YorkshireExpat (talk) 17:38, 16 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 00:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 00:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dual-named fungi should use the teleomorph name (see teleomorph, anamorph and holomorph for background). Plantdrew (talk) 01:28, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.