Talk:Chromatics (band)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Covering Chromatics in Colour is like covering Meteorology in Cloud. That is why we need a separate wikipage. Www.wikinerds.org 19:54, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

But the article on colour says more about chromatics than did this article. If it gets to the point where there's too much information in Color, then it can be separated out, but why create informationless stubs when there's genuine information in the existing article? --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:17, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Nathan Johnson (talk) 00:20, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chromatics → Chromatics (band) – I request that the article Chromatics, concerning the band by that name, be renamed to Chromatics_(band). This is in preparation for my publishing a new article about the company Chromatics, a manufacturer of color graphics display computers. I would name that article Chromatics_(computer_manufacturer) and request that both be placed into the Chromatic disambiguation page. Rdb112 (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kind oppose. I love the drive to write a new article--great job! Once you post it, we will change the top line of this article (or you can do it yourself) and it will contain a link to the article on the computer manufacturer (an article that mioght just do better at Chromatics (graphics), Chromatics (manufacturer), etc.), and then if we see that there's no primary topic, we can do a WP:RM again. But right now we can't move the article yet because it's the primary topic at this point. Red Slash 21:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, surprisingly "chromatics are" in Google Books picks up too many entries such as Winslow Yerxa Blues Harmonica For Dummies 2012 Page 23 "Positions: Chromatics are designed to play in all keys on one harmonica," ...so the plural naturally should redirect to the dab. The band are notable but not that notable and in Google Books appear a lot as The Chromatics (incorrectly). Also the 1980s computer company Chromatics looks notable for an article, good luck with that. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:41, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support "chromatics" should point to the disambiguation page -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 04:24, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support independent move of the band article to disambiguated namespace. Of course, there seems to be an underlying assumption that the company article will move into the liberated space, but I would contest that. The proposer should be thinking more along the lines of 'Chromatics (company)', or as Red Slash suggests above. -- Ohc ^¡digame!_{¿que pasa?} 08:31, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
So, I'm not entirely sure what happens next. I've created the article Chromatics (graphics) and would like to complete the move of this article, Chromatics, to Chromatics_(band). Are we in agreement that this is OK? And, I would then add Chromatics_(band) to the page Chromatic (disambiguation). But does there need to be a new page, Chromatics, which points to that disambiguation page? Thanks for the assistance. Rdb112 (talk) 13:31, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chromatics (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]