This Beatles-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles articles
Other :Project: Add {{WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here.
This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
"Original nonsense freeverse poems"? Is this confirmed, or assumed? I've heard that it was Gaelic, but I don't know the language so I can't ascertain this. Could we get this checked out? Andrei Iosifovich (talk) 15:10, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The length of the 1995 version is not written out anywhere in the body
Changed it to 2:19 as this is the time that Winn (2009) uses.
Genre should be named as Christmas but pipe to the same Wiki, plus write out and source the genre in background and comp since sources shouldn't be in the infobox
Done.
Separate the songwriters using bullet points instead
"by the English rock band" → "by English rock band" with the pipe
Done.
Shouldn't you mention it being recorded for their fifth Christmas record then write the title and add release year in brackets? Also, remove wikilink on Christmas record.
Done and done.
"of the group," → "of the band,"
Done.
"sung by the Beatles," → "sung by them,"
Done.
Are you sure the producer and actor introductions are needed here when they are used in the body?
You're right, it's not necessary. Removed.
It is not sourced that the refrain is the title of the song
Remove introduction to who the Beatles are, as that being in the lead is enough
Done.
"distributed in December" → "which were distributed in December"
Done.
The change of tense in the second sentence reads awkwardly; shouldn't it be something like "later years incorporate skits and music" because the records still exist?
Yeah, agreed. Fixed.
Shouldn't you mention the title of the record in the following sentence because even RS writes it out?
Done.
"a fictional group, "The Ravellers"," → "a fictional group named the Ravellers" per MOS:THEMUSIC and speech marks not being needed
"CD single,[18] released in the UK" → "CD single in the UK" to avoid repetition of "released", plus move [18] to solely at the end of the sentence after [16]
Done.
"Winn writes that it is" → "Winn says it is"
Done.
"in a limited-edition box set," → "on limited-edition box set"
On hold until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 09:03, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
