Talk:Christian von Ehrenfels

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Social and political / Continental / Modern / Contemporary Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Social and political philosophy
	Continental philosophy
	Modern philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Freiherr

If Freiherr means "Baron", does "Freiherr von Ehrenfels" mean "Baron of Ehrenfels", a place name? If so, what was this person's name? And isn't the lack of information dreadful? Unfree (talk) 15:13, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Christian von Ehrenfels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:28, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

I don't understand how does calling a racist a racist make this article not neutral? The editor from Brazil who applied that tag once told me that it was wrong to call Wilhelm II a white supremacist, which either reflects an admiration for the Kaiser and/or a lack of understanding of the man, and that it was "normal" for white people to hate Asian people in the early 20th century. The latter point is correct, but the question is of perspective. The editor from Brazil told me explicitly that the Yellow Peril article should be written from an "European perspective", and exclude the viewpoint of the Asian victims, which strikes me as a questionable and objectionable way of handling the subject. Why should the viewpoint of the victims be excluded? Asians certainly did not see the "Yellow Peril" viewpoint as "normal", and I don't understand why the editor from Brazil has such a problem with that. The editor from Brazil certainly seems to think this article is not neutral because it calls Ehrenthels a racist. Perhaps he would like this article better if documented Ehrenthels's noble efforts to warn the white race of the necessity of sexual reforms to counter the "Yellow Peril"?--A.S. Brown (talk) 23:58, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful of doxxing and personal attacks here: please address the content instead. Zezen (talk) 10:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christian von Ehrenfels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160407031930/http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Kafka.PDF to http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/kafka.PDF

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Style fixes needed

I fixed some obvious grammatical errors. Also white -> White, black -> Black etc. (as a concept) should be used almost everywhere here and in related racialist articles. Zezen (talk) 10:50, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]