Jump to content

Talk:Christian contemplation/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Untitled

I would like to add that the 'criticism' section links to an article that uses circular logic and a single POV to 'criticize' contempletive prayer. (E.g. the author uses Biblical quotes ad hoc to support his claims.) Unfortunately, as there is no universal understanding of 'union with God', any claim on its value is completely subjective, and opinion doesn't have a place in encyclopedic articles. Therefore, we aught to keep to the facts and describe contemplative prayer rather than put value judgements on it.

Needs a lot of work, general formatting to fit the standards. The external link at the bottom needs changed too - by no means is it universally agreed upon that contemplation is in any way "dangerous", so there's an apparent NPOV issue here. I suggest discussing in the body negative views on contemplation, not just linking to an alternate website. Maybe use that link as an example.Theli 93

I agree thoroughly about this piece failing minimal standards of scholarship. This article is remarkably biased and needs to be removed. It lacks objectivity and clearly seeks to promote one viewpoint. No alternative explanations are given and the writer presents highly judgemental conclusions without substantiating evidence. This is the poorest article that I have seen on Wikipedia.

I'll reformat a little bit to try to make it work. Any changes to my writing by anyone are, of course, appreciated. Theli 93

This article makes the claim that contemplative prayer and centering prayer are the same, and then gives the method of centering prayer as its description. In fact, in the Christian Tradition, the two are strongly distinct: centering prayer is a form of mental meditation, where contemplative prayer is a prayer of the soul. I can give a drastic re-write of this section if I don't hear any complaints.

Additionally, this article claims that contemplative prayer was in decline after the 14th century. To the contrary, it experienced wide acclaim in the 16th century do to the writings and works of St. John of the Cross and St. Therese of Avila, and remained a principal form of prayer in certan Christian groups before Thomas Merton's influence. Threej_lc

Actually you are wrong. Centering prayer and contemplation are precisely identical. Please see the articles on the monastery website at the bottom. If you can provide sources that point to a revival of contemplation during the dominance of scholasticism, please change that - as it is I am keeping things as they stand. Theli 93

I haven't found any reference on Wikipedia of modern/conteporary contemplatives, most notably Jens Soering, whose writings on the subject of Centering Prayer and Centering Pratice have been noted by Basil Pennington and Thomas Keating, among others. His manual, The Way Of The Prisoner, is a major contribution to the study of CP. I would start an article on Soering, but I fear the inevitable concentration on his incarceration and the Haysom murders. Cravenmonket 23:05, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

I agree with Threej_lc: contemplative prayer is far older and more established than centering prayer. According to T. Keating, one of the founders of the centering prayer movement: "It is not contemplation in the strict sense, which in Catholic tradition has always been regarded as a pure gift of the Spirit, but rather it is a preparation for contemplation by reducing the obstacles caused by the hyperactivity of our minds and of our lives" (http://www.centeringprayer.com/intimacy/intimacy01a.htm). David Chiang 02:02, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Also, how can it be said that contemplation suffered decline from the scholastic period through the 20th century when St. Teresa of Avila and St. John of the Cross, two of the most significant exponents of contemplative prayer, lived in the 16th century? I don't understand this point. David Chiang 02:07, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

I see, the history section is drawn from the Centering Prayer literature and is essentially a history of the roots of Centering Prayer. Since "Centering prayer" is the more precise term and even at least one of its proponents is careful to point out the difference between centering prayer and contemplative prayer, I am going to move most of this article over to Centering prayer (which already exists but is very short) unless someone objects.... David Chiang 14:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Shlagbaum and Szweizer

With all due respect, please note that:

  • the link is to a page asking for money
  • the book is self-published
  • the reference was provided by one of the authors

I do not think this is consonant with Wikipedia's policies. David Chiang 22:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Moved comment

I have removed this comment from the article, as it seemed to belong here better:

The later list is incorrect. St Teresa and St John both had seven level of contemplative prayer. The first three levels have to do with finding God, gaining knowledge, and recognizing what in this world creates a boundary that limits the closeness that we can have with God. They are a purification of the body and the will. After recognizing the boundary, we must overcome the boundaries so that we can be open the the next four levels. The top four levels are spiritual and contain charismata that are given individually as God knows best. A level seven contemplative will have all the gifts God bestows. Between each Level, a person will go through a dark night of the soul that can last a day, or many years. It is a difficult time where the conscience thirsts for God because He is unrecognizable in daily life. It is at these times that He is working deep in our hearts, cleansing our souls, and preparing us for the next gift He desires to share.
John Carter (talk) 17:32, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

SVChapel as a Source

I have removed the source - Contemplative Prayer, the heart of Mysticism in Think On These Things by Gary Gilley from this article, as it does not comply with the guidelines for WP:V, specifically WP:sps:

Per WP:V

Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason self-published media, whether books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, Internet forum postings, tweets etc., are largely not acceptable.[nb 4] Self-published material may, in some circumstances, be acceptable when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications. However, caution should be exercised when using such sources: if the information in question is really worth reporting, someone else is likely to have done so.

While Gilley has published three books I can find, none deal with Contemplative Prayer. A church website is clearly self-published and has no place in Wikipedia.--Lyonscc (talk) 17:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't claim to be an expert on Wikipedia policies, but there's an obvious difference between some bored individual putting up MyUnsolicitedOpinions.com and an organization addressing the public through its official website. By that logic, Roman Catholic Church shouldn't have all those links to http://vatican.va. TruthIIPower (talk) 02:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
It is true that you are not an expert on WP policies, then. vatican.va is the official website of the Catholic Church, so just like the words of a subject of a biography of a living person can have his/her self-published sites cited, and the Southern Baptist Convention can have it's official site cited, etc. However, when dealing with topics like "Protestantism", one cannot cite the self-published church website of any protestant church. In the same way, just because a church is interested in commenting on "Contemplative Prayer", "Penal Substitutionary Atonement", etc. does not mean that their self-published material complies with WP:V. In fact, it would not.
I will be removing this source again from the main page. I do not want to get into an edit war with you. I will also leave a note on your talk page in this regard. In this particular case, the burden of proof is on you to show that a source complies with WP:V before it can be added to the active page. If you would like to take this for a third opinion, I am open to that, but please also be aware that if you revert this again, you may be guilty of the three revert rule. I am willing to take this for a third opinion or for mediation, but please be aware that a church website will not pass muster required to be a WPV source for the reasons cited above. You are better off finding a source (independently published book, peer-reviewed journal, etc.) than trying to add in self-published sources as viable citations.--Lyonscc (talk) 02:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Article quality & references

This article needs help, and big time help. There are empty sections(!!!) and few references and it is mostly haphazard sentences. I will try to clean it up in a few days, in the meantime suggestions will be appreciated. History2007 (talk) 09:00, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

I had tried to introduce the article Mystic prayer, but I got an appeal for it's redirection to contemplative prayer and so I just inserted what I wrote in the article Mystic prayer under a Mystic subsection in contemplative prayer. Whereas as things stand, the article Mystic Prayer is a redirection page to contemplative prayer. Alan347 (talk) 11:59, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Merge with Christian contemplation

There is not much substance in Christian contemplation and it has no sources and is just floating there. Should merge. History2007 (talk) 17:28, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Agree. The combined article should be called Christian contemplation, since the longer and much better article is solely on Christian contemplative prayer. Esoglou (talk) 19:32, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Yes, fine. I think this article is longer for sure, but perfect... ? It has some concepts right, but misses a lot of items in a pretty large field. It can use help but I cannot do it now, maybe in 6 months if it has not been fixed by then. History2007 (talk) 19:43, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
I don't think we need wait six months to merge them. Improvements can be added at any time. Esoglou (talk) 20:09, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
You can merge them in a few days if you like. I do not mind. In fact there is nothing worth keeping in that short telegram/article anyway. So it should just redirect here whenever you like once the flag has been up for a few days. I meant that this article has shortcomings, e.g. some sources are just websites, several key names are missing, various techniques are missing, etc. The whole history of how contemplation came about where Teresa of A. and John of C. got their ideas etc. is missing... and on and on.... Rowan Williams' book on Teresa has a wealth of info. Also a discussion of how it fell out of favor to some extent with the unenlightenment etc. and how Benedict XVI is hoping for "a new spring" for it etc. So if you have fixed it in 6 months great, less work for me, else I will try then. History2007 (talk) 20:15, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
By the way, I just realized that in Feb 2010 I had said I was going to clean it up in a few days! But there was also Contemplative Christianity which went to the bizzare article on esoteric Christianity that is totally unkempt and a mess - as well as often unsourced/wrongly sourced. I corrected the redirect anyway. History2007 (talk) 23:31, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Given that there is no objection, I think we can merge. If you want to do it, please do, else I will do it soon. But overall, several of these prayer articles are of low quality. To clean them up, we need a better structure anyway. I have almost finished fixing Lectio Divina - which got me to this page. And I had previously fixed Christian meditation to get a good article flag. I think we need to use the 3 level "accepted structure" that the articles refer to, i.e.: "Christian X", where X is in {prayer, meditation, contemplation}. Then there should be a top level short article that explains the 3 level structure and refers to them. The article Christian prayer is also in semi-hopeless form and needs to be fixed. Christian worship also needs major help. The worst one is probably prayer for the dead, and needs some type of resurrection at some later point. But all in good time, I guess. History2007 (talk) 09:20, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

There was so little in the "Christian contemplation" article - scarcely anything but the bare list of references given in the index of the Reader's Guide attached to in some editions of the Catechism of the Catholic Church - that I just inserted the equivalent into this article. Although "Christian contemplation" seems to me to be a more exact title, I have not moved this article to that other name: it may be better to leave that to you, who seem to have plans for a more general rearrangement. Esoglou (talk) 12:24, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Ok, fine. I am actually not looking forward to working on the Christian worship or prayer for the dead items etc. But sometimes these things are so low quality one feels worse leaving them that way than spending all the unpaid effort fixing them.... sigh... History2007 (talk) 13:17, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
By the way, I looked and there is also Prayer in the New Testament which is really unkempt and neglected. It makes statements like: "there are eight different types of prayer in the New Testament" and I have not checked if that is a generally accepted statement. You know more about the New Testament, so if you want to donate some time there, and even delete a lot of the semi-sourced claims that do not look right to you, it would help. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 16:05, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Merged article

The article was merged via discussion on Talk:Contemplative_prayer#Merge_with_Christian_contemplation. History2007 (talk) 13:14, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Examples of religiously neutral articles on similar topics

Where can I find examples of religiously neutral articles on similar topics to help in revising this article?

Most specifically I'd like to include other perspectives on the same experiences, like rational / skeptic / neurologist / psychologist interpretations of these exact same phenomena.

Or at the very least a link to "further reading" on such perspectives. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1010:B127:6A5D:C45C:B5F4:E434:4BFF (talk) 17:08, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Christian contemplation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Move & move & move & merge

Moved to Contemplative prayer

I've moved the content from Christian contemplation to Contemplative prayer, since that is the proper topic of that content. "Christian contemplation" can be used as a disambiguation page. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Move from Theoria (Eastern Orthodox Christianity)

I've moved the content from Theoria (Eastern Orthodox Christianity) to here; it's the same topic. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Moved to Mystical theology

I've moved a substantial amount of information from Christian contemplation to Mystical theology. See Talk:Theoria (Eastern Orthodox Christianity) for the history of this information. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Merged from Contemplative prayer

To make things even more complicated, I've merged "Contemplative prayer" back into Christian contemplation, to which I've also moved the content from Theoria (Eastern Orthodox Christianity). And that content was first at Theoria, which I had moved to Theoria (Eastern Orthodox Christianity). 'That's all, folks'... (sorry for the complicated merge & move history). Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Objections

I must state for the record that I think you did a very poor job on this article. I disagree with how this article was taken over for someone who appears to have maybe a surface and very Western Eurocentric POV and an atheist one. LoveMonkey (talk) 17:42, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Can you provide a set of valid sources that state the very obvious thing you did in this article which is to say that all Christian contemplation is one big giant same thing? This article appears to be original research and appears to be your (Joshua Jonathan) opinion. LoveMonkey (talk) 17:59, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
@LoveMonkey: your comment "someone who appears to have maybe a surface and very Western Eurocentric POV and an atheist one" comes close to a personal attack; my personal beliefs are not relevant for this article, nor are yours. As for your statement "the very obvious thing you did in this article which is to say that all Christian contemplation is one big giant same thing", please explain this and provide concrete examples. Otherwise, it's not clear to me what you're referring to. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:46, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Sources are. I ask again please provide sources for the edits that you have made. Starting with the merging of the Theoria Orthodox Theological concept article with this article which is making the theoria of Greek theology the same as all of the other content in the article. LoveMonkey (talk) 18:56, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Please be more clear. You seem to imply that theoria is not the same as Christian contemplation. Is that your point? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:57, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

So again provide your sources here on the talkpage. Here I will start here is an academic book published by an academic source which is peer reviewed. It does not treat this subject in the way that your edits have made this article treat the same subject. Stanley S. Haraka (1983), Toward Transfigured Life: The Theoria of Eastern Orthodox Ethics, Light and Life Publishing Co. LoveMonkey (talk) 18:59, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop demanding sources for a point which you haven't made clear yet. If you think that this source "does not treat this subject in the way that your edits have made this article treat the same subject," you'll have to make clear, with examples, how my "edits have made this article treat the same subject," how this source treats this topic, and where the differences are. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:04, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Be bold says I can ask for sources. Please provide sources to your edits. I think we should take this to the Original Research edit board on here. LoveMonkey (talk) 19:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
You're not very willing to explain your point, are you? Again: You seem to imply that theoria is not the same as Christian contemplation. Is that your point? If you want sources, then make clkear for what edits you want sources. Otherwise, it souns like WP:OWN. By the way: Light and Life Publishing Co. looks like a religious organisation; is that WP:RS? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:13, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Again provide me with academic sources that say that Eastern Orthodox Theoria is the same thing as Roman Catholic contemplation. Since your edits have removed any such distinction. I have just now provided you with a source that does not say that Eastern Orthodox theoria is the same thing as other and generic Christian contemplation. LoveMonkey (talk) 19:15, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
And now you are attacking Elizabeth R. Moberly of the Journal of Religion at University of Chicago and Stanley S. Harakas as not valid sources and that therefore means you don't have to provide sources? LoveMonkey (talk) 19:22, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
So, that is your point indeed. So, where does the article say that it is the same? And where specifically does your (non-WP:RS) say that it is not the same? NB: Theoria (Eastern Orthodox Christianity) also had a section on "Roman Catholic Church." Which, by the way, stated that "The soul has three states, or stages, of perfection: the purgative way (that of cleansing or purification, katharsis in Greek), the illuminative way (receiving divine light) and the unitive way (indwelling in God)." Is that different from the eastern Orthodox Churches? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:29, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
I am indeed saying that the way theoria and hesychasm are treated in the Eastern Orthodox Church is not at all the same as these subjects are treated and or seen as being the same in at least the Eastern Orthodox Community and say the Roman Catholic community: David Henderson (2013), Apophatic Elements in the Theory and Practice of Psychoanalysis: Pseudo-Dionysius and C.G. Jung, Routledge. Since you did these edits what do you know and or what sources are you using to inform your edits? LoveMonkey (talk) 19:35, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! That's a good quote, and a very interesting distinction. Allow me the time to let that sink in. Was that distinction also clearly made in Theoria (Eastern Orthodox Christianity)? It also said:

In the Roman Rite (sometimes called the Latin or Western) Catholic Church, terms derived from Latin contemplatio, such as the English word "contemplation", are generally used in languages that are largely derived from Latin, rather than the Greek term theoria. The equivalence of the Latin and Greek terms[88] was noted by John Cassian, whose writings influenced the whole of Western monasticism,[89] in his Conferences.[90] However, Catholic writers do sometimes use the Greek term.[91]

So, that section does say that the two terms are equivalent, doesn't it? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:20, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

NB: it also said, in "Eastern Orthodox Catholic and Eastern Catholic Churches":

According to the standard ascetic formulation of this process, there are three stages [of theosis]: katharsis or purification, theoria or illumination, and theosis or deification (also referred to as union with God).[43]

That is exactly the same as what was written in the section on Roman Catholicism, isn't it? So, that article said that theoria and contemplatio are equivalent terms; and it said that Eastern-Orthodox theosis, and western perfection of the soul, have the same three stages. So, if there are distinctions, they were already blurred, don't you think? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:27, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
NB2: which means that the quote from Frederic Nef, as quoted by David Henderson, is a relevant addition to the present section on "Christian contemplation." Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:33, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
NB3: I can't access page 16 of henderson; can you read it? What does it say? Why this note? Does it refer to theoria as used on Easter-Orthodox Churches and theosis, or does it refer to Greek philosophy? What's the context? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:37, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia can not be used to source Wikipedia. I just posted above a source that says that contemplato is not theoria [1]. I can say from your comments you are very unfamiliar with the subject of Christian Contemplation but you are destroying and using broad generalizations while editing an article on it. Here is another source that states that theoria is to see the uncreated light and that is not and does not mean the same thing that Augustine meant [2] when he spoke of contemplato which is to conclude an abstract idea or concept. Again what are your sources what content have you read outside of Wiki itself that you are using to say things like theoria in the Eastern Orthodox church is the same as what the Roman Catholic church teaches is contemplative prayer. "Cant you see the obvious conclusion I am drawing" but actual sources that state that theoria in the Eastern Orthodox is the same thing as in all other Christianities. Cause my sourcesarent saying that [3] Also are you saying you have read the sources in this article including say V Lossky or John Romanides and you are saying that they are saying that all Christian contemplation is the same? I need to see what sources you are using as the ones I have provided are not saying that theoria to the Greek Orthodox church is the same thing as contemplative pray to the any other group. Let alone that is the same as the pagan philosophers of the past. LoveMonkey (talk) 21:28, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Response by JJ:
  • When discussing the content of an article, we definitely refer to the content of the article. What else are we to discuss here at the talkpage? I'm referring to information that you probably added, that's still in the article, and that contradicts your pov. So, what are you objecting to, then?
  • I asked you if David Henderson is referring to Orthodox theoria, or to Greek philosophy theoria; you didn't answer that question.
  • Nicolas Laos is referring to the distinction between Aristotelian theoria and Orthodox theoria, not to a distinction between Augustine and Orthodox churches.
  • And again, where does the Wiki-article say something like "theoria to the Greek Orthodox church is the same thing as contemplative pray to the any other group"? You've still not provided concrete examples or quotes. It does state, though, loud and clear, that theosis and hesychasm, are estern practices.
I'm quite willing to discuss this article to improve this content, but as long you can't give concrte examples and quotes of what you're objecting against, we're only "discussing" what you state the article says, not what's actually there.
I'm off to bed now; have a nice evening. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 22:22, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

I've copied info from Mystical theology to emphasize the difference between eastern and western practices/ideas. NB: the lead clearly states:

Christianity took up the use of both the Greek (theoria) and Latin (contemplatio, contemplation) terminology to describe various forms of prayer and the process of coming to know God. Eastern and Western traditions of Christianity grew apart as they incorporated the general notion of theoria into their respective teachings.

Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:40, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

I've also added some specifications diff diff as for which practice/terminology belongs to which church. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:56, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Theoria is not a practice in Eastern Orthodoxy, theoria means to "see God" and not in your mind and or coming to some rationalization (via contemplating i.e. looking at stuff like the other "interpretations of it by other Christian churches or other religions"). Heyschasm is the ascetic "practice" and prayer that first completes in a person self control and then allows that person to free their mind of distraction and then allows that person to focus their entire existence (soul or nous (consciousness) is mind and heart) on God. Once they engage this lifestyle some are blessed (theosis) to have the mystical experience to see the uncreated light which is to see and experience the supernatural, to see or experience God. Theoria is that witness to term in Eastern Orthodoxy that means to see God. [4]
If you were read up on the subject you'd know that Augustine refused the mystical as Augustine clearly stated that he had never "seen God" and as the Eastern Orthodox keep saying that Augustine was teaching people how to swim and he himself had never swam.
"In contrast to this Augustinian approach to language and concepts concerning God, we have the Patristic position expressed by Saint Gregory the Theologian against the Eunomians. Plato had claimed that it is difficult to conceive of God but, to define Him in words is an impossibility. Saint Gregory disagrees with this and emphasizes that "it is impossible to express Him, and yet, more impossible to conceive Him. For that which may be conceived may perhaps be made clear by language, if not fairly well, at any rate imperfectly..."
The most important element in Patristic epistemology is that the partial knowability of the divine actions or energies, and the absolute and radical unknowability and incommunicability of the divine essence is not a result of the philosophical or theological speculation, as it is in Paul of Samosata, Arianism, and Nestorianism, but of the personal experience of revelation or participation in the uncreated glory of God by means of vision or theoria. Saint Gregory defines a theologian as one who has reached this theoria by means of purification and illumination, and not by means of dialectical speculation. Thus, the authority for Christian truth is not the written words of the Bible, which cannot in themselves either express God, but rather the individual apostle, prophet, or saint who is glorified in God." [5]
And thank you for the changes you have made. LoveMonkey (talk) 12:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Response by JJ:
  • Funny, this summary of theosis/theoria/practice/experience was also on my mind this afternoon.
  • The distinction between intellect/contemplatio/theoria and ratio/scientia makes perfect sense to me. It seems to me that an incredibily valuable practice c.q. way of life was lost in the west with the end of the medieaval times, and the turn from 'contemplatio' to 'scientia'. For me, it was astonishing to find this treasure in Eastern Orthodox Christianity. Have you ever studied Buddhism? I see some strong resemblances, and find it hearthening that Europe has not been a complete desert in this regard, but also has a living mystical tradition, though less known in western Europe. Some missionary work to do for the Orthodox Churches! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 13:12, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
PS: wasn't Augustine also the one who first created the predestination-doctrine? Quite a difference with this Eastern Orthodox way of religiosity! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 13:15, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
PS2: read Neo-Advaita for some western-European c.q. American discussions on "... if Symeon can have such a vision then why can't anyone (including non-Orthodox)? They also argue against the need for purification and illumination to take place before such a vision can be granted." It's also a recurrent theme in (Zen-)Buddhism: sudden illumination & liberation versus gradual parctice. As Maezumi Roshi wrote in The Hazy Moon of Enlightenment: "enlightenment" is the start of real practice, not the end. Besy regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 13:21, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Yes I have studied Buddhism and various forms of Hinduism and also Chinese folk religions and some Japanese folk religions. I have not mastered them nor see them as things to attack and I have a deep love of all whom seek after the good as Plato might say. I created the wiki bio of Eugene Webb due to having ecumenism and comparative religion conversations. As for Augustine he was first a follower of what today is called gnosticism (Manichaeism) so yes he introduced some of that into his theology. LoveMonkey (talk) 13:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
"if Symeon can have such a vision then why can't anyone (including non-Orthodox)? They also argue against the need for purification and illumination to take place before such a vision can be granted." Yes this is exactly why I have complained by putting this theology in a comparative religion article (and context) you are misrepresenting it and this is very hard for people who I have spoken with in the past and if they are fans of writers like Joseph John Campbell, Alan Watts, Colin Wilson and or people like Robert Graves and or Gerald Gardner it very hard to get them to understand this. But I can clarify.[6] LoveMonkey (talk) 13:55, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Please forgive me for this because I understand it might cause great confusion but you would only ask these questions if you see religions as rational pursuits and as such then Eastern Orthodoxy is not really a religion at all. [7] It is a simple way of praying it is not a system or Hesiod like system of prognostication for which to reduce the world to knowledge or information. I apologize if that is abit to abrupt. LoveMonkey (talk) 14:08, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
I fully understand your point here (at least, I think so). I'm not a fan of Perennialism and like-minded systems, though I do think there are 'universals' to mystical "experience." And no, I do not think that religion is about rational pursuits or "reduc[ing] the world to knowledge or information"; on the contrary. I think that mystical experience in and of itself. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:27, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Ah, John Romanides: "His theological works emphasize the empirical basis of theology called theoria or vision of God, (as opposed to intellectual-contemplative) as the essence of Orthodox theology. He identified hesychasm as the core of Christian practice and studied extensively the works of 14th-century Byzantine theologian St. Gregory Palamas." You're influenced by him, aren't you? I recognize the theme. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:49, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Well that actually applies to and is documented in the Philokalia. Its not Romanides at all. That is a very Western and very wrong and uninformed thing for people to say. If people read the source material and theological works of that community (church) that above would even apply to other ethnic groups like Romanian Theologians like Dumitru Stăniloae and all the way to Christ as Christ fasted and prayed as Christ was an ascetic. LoveMonkey (talk) 15:31, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Also it seems that people here don't follow ACTUAL Greek Philosophy as if they did they would know that even Christos Yannaras is saying the same things. LoveMonkey (talk) 15:34, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Christian contemplation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Moved from Christian contemplation

I've moved the content from Christian contemplation to Contemplative prayer, since that is the proper topic of that content. "Christian contemplation" can be used as a disambiguation page. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Merged to Christian contemplation

And to make things even more complicated, I've merged "Contemplative prayer" back into Christian contemplation, to which I've also moved the content from Theoria (Eastern Orthodox Christianity). And that content was first at Theoria, which I had moved to Theoria (Eastern Orthodox Churches). 'That's all, folks'... (sorry for the complicated merge & move history). Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Christian_contemplation/Archive_1&oldid=1136305088"