Talk:Chief Technology Officer of the United States

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations articles

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance).

Science Policy Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Untitled

Created the article. I don't know if Aneesh Chopra has been confirmed yet. Qutorial (talk) 20:39, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They have been confirmed and I went ahead and added it as well as a source. Darkwraith (talk) 18:57, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He just stepped down. Someone with the skills to edit Wikipedia properly want to update the article? Haplo 02:18, 30 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.10.117.226 (talk)

File:AneeshChopra.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:AneeshChopra.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:AneeshChopra.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

weird rant in beginning of article

the following weird rant was at the beginning of the article, I'm not sure whether it was meant to be a block quote, but if so it seems a bit long to be in the wikipedia article:

********************************************************************************************************************************

In my opinion, Any US industry that contributed strongly to US exports and relies on Advanced knowledge in Science. Engineering, or other technical knowledge that is not easily acquired should be protected by an "ITAR" like regulation that restricts people born in foreign countries to participate in those industries.

Obviously, the Aerospace, Nuclear, space, and defense industries are already protected like that.... but all the other cash cows are not....example, semiconductors, or engineering and software services, and we see the result.... it makes companies turn into traitors against the American economy by refusing to hire Americans even if they are qualified and offshoring the R&D teams and selling out the knowledge to the lowest common denominator on the world-wide payscale...

I don't understand why the US government can't just set something up to deny visas to foreigners based on protecting sensitive US industries to trade secret thief... Example, CISCO... sorrry CISCO of INTEL, all future visas are banned due to "protection of sensitive" industries from trade secrete thief....

I know...its too late to think that way in those industries... but certainly there are new industries forming all the time that maybe should get that type of protection so thast they develop into US trade secrets and turn into cash cows because nobody else in the world has figured it out for many years...

and certainly there's no reason, that intel and CISCO can't be persuaded to setup departments for new and advanced products that are to remain as US trade secrets and restricted from foreign born participating because they are becoming the new cash cows of the company.... why couldn't Intel for instance start a new secret x86 processor or secrete semiconductor manufacturing tech. and make sure that everybody they hire is from the United states and the project is setup as a US trade secret that restricts knowledge from leaving the US?? I think trump should go to all the US companies and convince them to setup trade secret tanks like that to incubate new US tradde secretes and mandate that they must be protected from foreign-born on the job training...designed to put US citizens in the lead and holding the trade secrets that the rest of the company and foreign born population are not alllow to have knowledge of....that's how you build value for the United States.... they need the next genration technologies to be owned whole by US pop. and not exportable.. ********************************************************************************************************************************

Is there still a US CTO?

I can not seem to figure out if the position still exists, and is just unfilled, or if there is someone who has gotten no fanfare. The article should clarify this.