Talk:Chhinnamasta/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AdamBMorgan (talk) 14:17, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

   Under Symbolism and associations, a sentence starts "A commentator prescribes her worship by soldiers" - the wording is vague. Which commentator has prescribed this worship? The reference, Kinsley (1997, p. 155), is a page not available through Google Books, so I cannot clarify this myself.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   1B needs to be resolved to pass this review.

Problem resolved so:-

1. B. MoS compliance:

Pass or Fail:

Good article review passed. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 12:03, 16 April 2010 (UTC)