Talk:Cheshire murders/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: AGK [•] 12:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

Engaging and tightly-written, and covers all the bases of the subject matter. A definite plus is how well the article deals with the subject in a neutral way: it'd be easy to sensationalise the topic.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Everything referenced fine. Reliable sources for these topics are limited mainly to news stories (it takes a good decade for most crimes to make it into academic literature and at least five for journals, monthlies, etc.) so that's not a worry here.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Covers everything well.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
No licensing problems. Image usage is sparing but adequate.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Happy to grant this article GA status. AGK [•] 12:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]