Jump to content

Talk:Chen Xiaocui

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 18:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chen in 1934
Chen in 1934
  • ... that Chen Xiaocui (pictured) helped translating Sherlock Holmes into Chinese when she was still a child? Source: Zhao, Yufei (2019-06-30). 陳小翠年譜 [A Chronology of Chen Xiaocui]. 词学 (01): 369–98.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link), p. 371: "一九一三年 [...] 十二歲 [...] 陳栩發起成立「三人公司」,與李常覺(新甫)、吴覺迷、陳小蝶、陳小翠合作翻譯英美小説。譯本由李長覺主選並口述譯文,吴覺迷、陳小蝶、陳小翠分别记录,最后由陳栩删改潤飾定稿,署名「太常仙蝶」發表。五年中,「三人公司」合譯了包括《福爾摩斯探案集全集》在内的外國長短篇小説七十三部"

Created by TheLonelyPather (talk). Self-nominated at 23:25, 21 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Chen Xiaocui; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

ALT1: that Chen Xiaocui (pictured), Chinese painter and writer who helped translating Sherlock Holmes into Chinese, was persecuted and committed suicide during the Chinese Cultural Revolution?
  • Piotrus, thank you for the prompt review. Also many thanks for the alternative hook. Too many died during the Cultural Revolution that the fact of dying itself does not strike my nerves any more. Helping to introduce Sherlock Holmes when she was still a child, however, is remarkable. --TheLonelyPather (talk) 13:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Wiki Asia Month

[edit]

The author could submit this to Wiki Asia Month 2023 [1], seems to be a nice addition. Oaktree b (talk) 16:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It really would be nice, but unfortunately the article was created at 10/21/2023 10:59 PM. Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 08:24, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Chen Xiaocui/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GnocchiFan (talk · contribs) 23:53, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    I personally would not have as many Chinese characters throughout the article per MOS:ROMANISATION, but I understand why they may be helpful for some so will not oppose them. I would also use the term "died by suicide" instead of "committed suicide" in the lead (or possibly re-write to avoid either formulation), as this seems increasingly preferred by external style guides. However, I'm aware that Wikipedia's Manual of Style allows for this, so again no opposes there. (I'm also just being picky here as it is very difficult to find fault with this article)
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Edited to remove possible loaded language
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Congratulations, I see no reason why this article cannot be passed right away. – GnocchiFan (talk) 23:53, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.