Jump to content

Talk:Cheers (disambiguation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 7 January 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. The discussion centered on whether or not the TV series is the WP:primary topic for the title "Cheers", and no consensus was reached on that question. Station1 (talk) 05:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

– Although the American TV series is primary by usage its not likely by long-term significance. Its quite common to say "3 cheers". Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:32, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose I don't think there is any other real contender for WP:PRIMARYTOPIC#2 here. Saying cheers isn't an encyclopedic topic as evidenced by it having no article. Nohomersryan (talk) 23:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ... I was a massive fan of Cheers (American TV series) but it can't be more primary than cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:36, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose with chance of snow. Removing a clear primary target because it might someday not be a primary topic is jumping the gun, and would degrade the current functionality of the encyclopedia.--NapoliRoma (talk) 01:29, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nomination and In ictu oculi. There are 19 entries listed upon the Cheers (disambiguation) page, with the historical renown of the popular American TV series, which premiered in 1982, not exceeding the combined prominence of the remaining 18 entries, including the exclamation which long preceded the series and served as its title. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:55, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Looking over the DAB page, I'm convinced that the TV show is the primary topic. Rreagan007 (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I'm inclined to agree that long-term significance is in favor of the toast, but the problem is that there is negligible content about the toast on WP, nor is there an overwhelming amount of traffic related to it. For reference, here are the 30 day stats:
    • The American TV series has 135,168 page views. The second-most viewed page named or with an incoming redirect named "cheers" is for the Beacon Hill bar used for the show's establishing shots, at 4,282, followed by the Rihanna song at 2,536.
    • Of pages not actually named "cheers" nor with a redirect named "cheers", but linked from the dab page, the article for the musician Blackbear is on top with 19,790 visits (but I'd guess these are most likely not all incoming from "Cheers" -related links)
    • The page for "Toast (honor)" has 6,778 visits.
    • All articles named/redirected "cheers" other than the show: 9,403
    • All articles linked from the dab page but not named/redirected "cheers" : 39,288 (again, probably greatly inflated from non-"cheers" sources)
--NapoliRoma (talk) 05:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The statistics at [1] and [2] are an issue for this argument, as it seems apparent that there's at best about 1% of the traffic going the hatnote (it's not in the top 20, the 20th item is 1.15k while incoming total is 87k), the traffic is scattered quite well in the TV series universe (it doesn't seem readers are at a dead end), and the overall traffic at Cheers alone is orders of magnitude larger than the next eligible item on the list and more than the sum of the rest combined. --Joy (talk) 10:06, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Per stats; none of other entries seen in the dabpage can compete with the American TV series by usage. Furthermore, long-term significance of other topics is either equal to or lesser than—rather could not compete with—the series. George Ho (talk) 21:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, long-term significance favors the toast and not the show. Page views don't mean anything, and with lack of obvious PRIMARY I think DAB should be at base name.
Ortizesp (talk) 19:21, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would certainly support merging the Cheer (disambiguation) page, which was created in June 2021 and has the article "Cheering" as its WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, into the more-extensive Cheers (disambiguation) page, created nearly 16 years earlier, in October 2005. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 04:24, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Roman Spinner: Seems like a good place to perform a page swap then. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Zxcvbnm: By all means. I definitely agree that there is no need for two separate dab pages. The main title header of Cheers (disambiguation) can be moved to Cheer (disambiguation) or even to simply Cheer, depending upon consensus, thus satisfying those who prefer to leave the header for the TV series intact at Cheers. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 05:50, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You do make a good point, Cheer would be the best place to put the disambiguation. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Cheer" for Cheering is a justified primary topic, so I oppose this suggestion. Any move or merge involving Cheer or Cheer (disambiguation) should probably be its own discussion. 162 etc. (talk) 18:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And even if we do merge the plural DAB page (which I'd be fine with per WP:DABCOMBINE) it should be moved to the base name first if the plural doesn't have a primary topic. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:43, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cheers_(disambiguation)&oldid=1247254285"