Talk:Cheers (Drink to That)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sauloviegas (talk • contribs • count) 16:53, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-review comments

This article falls under WP:RECENTISM; it is still an ongoing event and new information may become available, thus altering the article significantly. GA nomination should be removed or placed on a significant time length review. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 23:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It was released as a Radio single and hasn't been given an official release. All the info about the music video has been released, and there won't be new reviews for the song or video now either. The only thing that is changing is the weekly chart positions. Nothing else in the article is changing. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 01:58, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with (CK)Lakeshade. It is definitely too early. I suggest that you wait for at least 8 weeks. Jivesh • Talk2Me 12:55, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article isn't going to get any significantly bigger in the near future. All that is changing now is the weekly chart positions. If it was a really big article, I'd understand, but it's not, it's only small. Beat of My Drum was created on June 3, 2011 and was nominated for GAN by August 11, and it has been reviewed. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 13:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So do you think that "Cheers (Drink to That)" will also chart in only three countries and that its chart performance section will be equally short? Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:54, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't. But that is also that is changing. The past week few weeks, all I have had to change is "In it's third week" to "In it's fourth week" to "In it's fifth week". lol Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 17:31, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The rule of thumb has always been to not nominate an article for GA until the artist has released another song. Agreed with lake. — Status {^talk_contribs 00:39, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fly has been released. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 01:03, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this as soon as possible. - Sauloviegas (talk) 15:43, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 22:23, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First look through

1 disambiguation link. Fix it, please. :) - Sauloviegas (talk) 12:38, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There aren't any suspicious or dead links. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 13:05, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm talking about wikilinks to disambiguation pages. - Sauloviegas (talk) 13:49, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which one is it? Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 14:03, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The disambiguation link is Blogger. - Sauloviegas (talk) 17:42, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

"and serves as the seventh overall single to be released from Loud". This songs like it will still be released as a single. Wasn't it released already?
I don't understand what you are saying? Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
"of Avril Lavigne's "I'm With You"," You already mentioned Lavigne before. It would be better like this: "of Lavigne's "I'm With You",".
Oh, I did that already. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 14:03, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
"Thus far, "Cheers (Drink to That)" has so far". Can you re-write this? I think it's a little weird...
Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
"charting at numbers five and eight, respectively, and has also peaked at number 11". Either "charting at numbers five and eight, respectively, and has also peaked at number eleven" or "charting at numbers 5 and 8, respectively, and has also peaked at number 11".
Single digit numbers are written as a word, double digits are written numerically. Have spilt into two sentences anyway. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 13:01, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. :) - Sauloviegas (talk) 13:49, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Background and composition

"digital music sheet published at Musicnotes". Either "digital music sheet published at Music Notes" or "digital music sheet published at musicnotes.com"
Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 13:04, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

"Upon the songs release, the song received generally positive reviews from music critics." -> "Upon its release as a single, "Cheers (Drink to That)" received generally positive reviews from music critics."
Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
"stated that as rock-arena song, which contains sample by Avril Lavigne is written for barroom singalongs," -> "stated that, as rock-arena song, which contains sample by Avril Lavigne, is written for barroom singalongs,"
Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
Try to replace "the song" (which is repeated a lot) with "Cheers (Drink to That)" or it when appropriate.
Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 13:13, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chart performance

"inside the the top 40" -> "inside the top 40"
Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
", "California King Bed".," -> ", "California King Bed"."
Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 13:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Music video

"which she wears for various difference parts of the each concert" Re-write this.
Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 13:16, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

Fix references 38 and 39. Add template citeweb.
Are those two sources reliable? I didn't add those in. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 13:17, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The second is, because it's the website from the director... Now the first one, I'm not sure. Who added those? - Sauloviegas (talk) 13:48, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Probably an IP judging by the formatting, or should I say, lack of formatting. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 14:03, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Well, what are you going to do? Remove it or keep it? If you remove, you should remove the director info of the music video section, or find another source. - Sauloviegas (talk) 17:42, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the first, and formatted the second. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 18:12, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Great! You still need to fix the disambiguation link, which is Blogger. - Sauloviegas (talk) 15:32, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Where is it here ? Because I don't see any issues. Dead links are the only ones that are a problem really. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 15:36, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

lol No, I'm talking about this! :) - Sauloviegas (talk) 23:24, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Think I have done what you mean. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 17:25, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Passing. - Sauloviegas (talk) 21:22, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I don't know of Jivesh had finished his comments below though :/ Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 02:29, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of course not. Jivesh boodhun (talk / Make sure you give 4 a try!!!) 04:17, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my God, I'm sorry, Jivesh! I thought you have done everything! Really sorry... :( - Sauloviegas (talk) 09:30, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter. Well, i am not sure i will continue now considering the amount of issues that have been highlighted by the use below. Jivesh boodhun (talk / Make sure you give 4 a try!!!) 11:13, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ooopss they are on the talk-page, not here. Jivesh boodhun (talk / Make sure you give 4 a try!!!) 11:15, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Jivesh

After 5 hours. Jivesh • Talk2Me 12:52, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Where are the recording locations?
I don't know, i don't have a physical copy of the album booklet. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
Which one of these are really the genres: incorporates the musical elements of dancehall[9], dance-pop,[10] pop rock,[11] and R&B? (taken from background and composition)
I removed the dancehall source and genre, but the Pop-rock one is from a critics review, so that is the genre. People like to add dancehall back in a lot. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!

Jivesh • Talk2Me 17:22, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

performed >>> recorded
Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
mpacted US Mainstream and Rhythmic radio >>> mpacted US mainstream and rhythmic radios
Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
The song impacted US Mainstream and Rhythmic radio on August 2, 2011, and serves as the seventh overall single to be released from Loud. Rewrite. If you want a suggestion, ask me. Feel free.
Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
"Cheers (Drink to That)" was produced by Harr and Jackson under their stage name The Runners, and contains interpolations of Lavigne's "I'm With You", which is featured on her album Let Go (2002). >>> Break the sentence as it does not make sense in this structure.
Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
which is featured on her album >>> which is featured on her debut album,
Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
confidence party-drinking >>> is that a quote from somewhere?
Removed "confidence" Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
By writing The song has received positive reviews from music critics, you are encouraging those who came with the WP:RECENTISM issue. Change to The song garnered positive reviews from music critics,
Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
who praised the interpolation of Lavigne's "I'm with You", as well as commenting that it would be a successful club song due to its lyrical content >>> Why the changed from past tense to the usage of -ing endings???
Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
"Cheers (Drink to That)" has so far managed to peak inside >>> managed??? Come on. Rihanna's songs do not struggle my dear Calvin. You know it much better than me. Lol
Done, but Man Down, California King Bed, If I Never See your Face Again, Who's That Chick, Rockstar 101, If It's Lovin That You Want, We Ride, Redemption Song and Wait Your Turn struggled. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
"Cheers (Drink to That)" has so far managed to peak inside the top ten in New Zealand and Australia, charting at numbers five and eight, respectively. >>> same here. You use past tense then switch to -ing endings.
Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
Who directed the video? Care to mention in lead. This will be questioned at FAC (if one is intended)
Done Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
"Cheers (Drink to That)" is included >>> was
Done I've never understood how it should be "was" when it is currently happening. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
It is set list. I have told you this so many times now.
Done Alrighttttttttttttttttttt Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 17:53, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

General Comment.: Finally you have decided to put the years in brackets!!! Why this change? Just curious. Jivesh • Talk2Me 17:33, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? I've always proceeded the tour name by the year in brackets. If I remember correctly, you told me last time not to do it if I don't do it for the songs as well. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!

Corrections done??? Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:54, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now they are... Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 17:53, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]