Talk:Cheam Range

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

"Four Sisters"

Something worth noting is this statement: "The western peaks in the range - Cheam, Lady, Baby Munday and Stewart, are known in areas of the Fraser Valley where there are visible, as the "Four Sisters"." While Cheam and Lady are for sure easily visible from the valley, I don't believe Baby Munday is, especially considering its western neighbor, Knight Peak, is higher than it and would more than likely block it from view. As for Stewart, I am unsure whether it is visible. It might be, or may not. But either way, what I'd love to know is, why would Knight not be part of the "Four Sisters"? I've actually never heard of the whole Four Sisters thing before other than here so if someone could educate me on that, it would certainly help.

By the way: If anyone reading this gets a chance, go climb up the Knight Peak trail. It comes off of the old section of Airplane Creek Road, crosses Airplane Creek, and goes up really steeply into the basin below Knight and Baby Munday Peak. From there you can directly reach the summit of Knight (which I did), and also access Baby Munday (class 3 scramble, fairly exposed I hear), Stewart Peak, and more than likely The Still. You can actually summit Knight, Baby Munday & Stewart in one day, although I only got to the top of Knight since I had some time limitations. Seriously though, check it out sometime... I'd be happy to provide more info to anyone whose interested.

AndrewEnns (talk) 18:21, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cheam Range. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928004706/http://www.canadianmountainencyclopedia.com/ArxPg.asp?ArxId=166 to http://www.canadianmountainencyclopedia.com/ArxPg.asp?ArxId=166

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:11, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]