Talk:Charles R. Black Jr.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Humongous POV and sourcing issues

This article is something in the way of a nightmare as far as sourcing and POV issues go, especially in the context of WP:BLP policies. I've started cleaning it up, but could use help. RayAYang (talk) 03:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lobbying section

Unsure what to do here, as the whole thing is a horrifying example of giving undue weight to the uglist clients on Black's list, without a review of others. I propose to slim it down by a good bit. RayAYang (talk) 03:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The text sounds as if copied and pasted from the company brochure or website without any editing. Definitely sub-sub-standard (and I would be very hesitant to.select a service provider with such an unbalanced self presentation).Chilrreh (talk) 20:22, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sun Myung Moon section

I will take this out since it is not at all well sourced. Here is the sentence in the Salon article which mentions Black:

"A flier for the event claimed an impressive who's-who of organizers, including Republicans Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Rep. Roscoe Bartlett of Maryland and Charlie Black, a top Republican strategist. Democrats were named, too, like Rep. Harold Ford of Tennessee, who, incidentally, claims to have not even heard of the event."

Thanks. Redddogg (talk) 13:52, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Presidential elections and Kasich

On March 20 2016, candidate Kasich cited, on CNN's State of the Union, Charlie Black as a supportive operative in his efforts to secure the GOP nomination for President.--Wikipietime (talk) 13:12, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles R. Black Jr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101102142121/http://www.prime-policy.com:80/news/charlie-black-inducted-aapc-hall-fame to http://www.prime-policy.com/news/charlie-black-inducted-aapc-hall-fame

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:00, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]